I paid a visit to one of my friends today. You guess what I saw? The fresh sample of Fenix L2P!~:wow: (My friend is a local distributor). Wow, L2P is really well made, pretty light. I took out my Fenix L1p for comparison, so surprised to see that they are very similar to each other in look. The screw threads are even the same. I thought all the parts can be exchanged. But my friend warned me not to use head of L1P in L2P, or it will be damaged.
Fenix L2p is really compact, terribly cute!
Then I began to test the brightness.
Both L1P and L2P use NI-MH batteries, obviously, L2P is really brighter than L1P. I was wondering the reason since both of them are introduced in the same brightness. But why L2P is brighter than L1P? I read the instruction more carefully and found their difference: L1P was just been said about the max brightness (It seems not so easy to achieve by using the 1.2 V NI-MH battery) but L2P was constant brightness. So L2P is certainly brighter than L1P.
Other beamshots
Both E1L and Q3 use 3v CR123A batteries。
My friend said that it's a only sample and didn't let me keep it home, so I had no time to test more about it. Everything will be ok after I purchase one then
Fenix L2p is really compact, terribly cute!
Then I began to test the brightness.
Both L1P and L2P use NI-MH batteries, obviously, L2P is really brighter than L1P. I was wondering the reason since both of them are introduced in the same brightness. But why L2P is brighter than L1P? I read the instruction more carefully and found their difference: L1P was just been said about the max brightness (It seems not so easy to achieve by using the 1.2 V NI-MH battery) but L2P was constant brightness. So L2P is certainly brighter than L1P.
Other beamshots
Both E1L and Q3 use 3v CR123A batteries。
My friend said that it's a only sample and didn't let me keep it home, so I had no time to test more about it. Everything will be ok after I purchase one then
Last edited: