Any more updates to problems with the current batches? I'm currently waiting on an SC600w MK III HI and an SC63w (ordered directly from ZebraLight). I should have the SC63w friday (according to USPS tracking, but it hasn't moved for two days, so we'll see).
As far as the MK III HI, ZL said it would be shipped "next week" (I placed the order 2.5 weeks ago when it was on backorder; I asked when it would ship, they said 2 weeks; when that 2 weeks came, I asked again for an update, and they said it would ship next week). :shrug:
Looking forward to compare them with my standard SC600w MK III, as well as my h602w. :naughty:
To me it makes no difference if it was a QC issue, production issue, or software issue. It is just another failure/defect to add to the list this last month or so alone. It just gives me less faith in ZL and their reliability/QC in general. Like I said, go read some of the other long threads on other manufactures lights. You just dont see near this many issues even over much more time and their production numbers far exceed ZL's. Zebralight may have some great ideas and even some of the best electronic designs in the industry but, I think they also have some of the highest failure/defect rates of any company….
So is there any update on if they'll do a run of the MK III/SC63 with the 90+ CRI XHP35s, or are those still incredibly hard to source?
No XHP35 that I know of. But the SC600Fd III Plus model is expected in August. That's an XHP50, but should be nice with the 93-95CRI @ 5000K. Sounds perfect on paper! We'll see what happens...
eg: The ZL SC600 III accepts only unprotected cells. Protected cells are simply too long. The unprotected 18650 cells from ZL fit just fine. The pogo-tabs simply do not have the compliance for protected cells.
Vinh sells the original MKIII as he explained in one of his videos that he just can't bring in any modifications to the light as everything is perfect. Don't know if that means he can still swap the LED inside though.
Seems like that would defeat the all the hard work ZL put into boosting their latest lights to work with the XHP35. Why not just ask him to swap it with a 90+ CRI XHP35?If he could I would love to send him one and pay him to swap the factory emitter with a Nichia 219B...
Seems like that would defeat the all the hard work ZL put into boosting their latest lights to work with the XHP35. Why not just ask him to swap it with a 90+ CRI XHP35?
I wasn't previously aware of that emitter option... What would be the differences in performance between the two (Nichia 219b & XHP35 90+ CRI)... Thanks....
The Cree would be outputting a lot more lumens, and have higher CRI overall, while the Nichia would probably still win out in deep red rendering (R9).
Apparently they are somewhat hard to source...otherwise we might see them from the factory from ZL. Still, it would be pretty sweet.
twistedraven covered the differences spot on. I'd personally prefer the XHP35 (HI) 90+ CRI for this application. If you could source one Vinh may be able to do it.
Here is some picture about the tail cap of SC600w mk3 HI I just bought. I am waiting from Zebralight to solve it.We are talking about the battery issue in particular here man. That has to do with marketing nor innovation. People have a right to criticize it when other lights that cost 1/3 as much dont have this issue. Zebralight makes some great lights and are always near the top in performance and efficiency but, they could definitely improve in the product testing and quality control side of things. I cant remember the last new ZL product release that didnt at least have some kind of teething issues. You just dont see this many issues with many other companies near as often. Even companies that sell their lights for half or one third the price.
Here is some picture about the tail cap of SC600w mk3 HI I just bought. I am waiting from Zebralight to solve it.
http://imgur.com/a/HlKFL?desktop=1