123 cell protection anatomy revealed

Ray_of_Light

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 11, 2003
Messages
1,150
Location
West Midlands, U.K.
Thank you Newbie for the hard (and dangerous) work!

I want to add just some notes. The positive electrode is the grid, made of an alloy of nickel, and has that black powder distributed in the holes. The black powder is the Manganese Dioxyde mixed with graphite.

The white porous membrane acts as physical separator and ionic conductor. It is wetted with the liquid, organic electrolyte. If the membrane melts, the battery is shorted.

The grey solid film is the lithium, the negative electrode. Once the battery is cut open, the lithium will keep generating hydrogen, as result of presence of water in the air.

The 123s use a wound structure, like Ni-MH batteries, to reduce their internal resistance.
An organic electrolyte must used due to high reactivity of the lithium with any water based compound. It has a specific resistence that is much higher than comparable acqueous solvent, and a wound structure reduces the resistance - since the exposed surface increases.
Alkaline batteries and backup lithium batteries use a non-wound structure (called "bobbin" structure).
No other commercial primary cells, aside from lithiums, use the wound structure, since it is expensive to produce.

Anthony
 

jsr

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,901
Location
socal
Brighteyez said:
You've made this posting in a rather authoritative demeanor. Do you know this for a fact, or was it just told to you (even if it was from Tenergy, as things might get lost in the translation, and I don't think the two ladies who answer the phones are real technical.)

I don't have any of their CR123 batteries, so I can't really tell for sure one way or the other either.

I was told this by the owner of BatteryJunction who carries Tenergies when I was looking into Tenergy cells. Seeing as PTC is a good selling feature, I wouldn't see any reason for him stating the Tenergy cells lack the PTC if it wasn't true. There's no way of knowing this by my opening the cell as I don't want to take the risk of doing so. Until Newbie opened up a cell, much of the info we had was also by someone just telling you (might be someone technical, the designer, a physicist, or just someone who played a lot with it and broke it apart). I think it's the same as Amondotech saying theirs has PTC...no one's torn one apart and they aren't the mfr (they buy cells from a battery mfr in china who, guaranteed, sells those cells to other customers/clients unless they have a contract limiting the design and Amondotech has paid all the NRE). I can personally only know so much by doing things myself (as with anyone). The rest I have to rely on the information of people much closer to the source of the information.
When I called Tenergy CS, I was surprised they connected me to one of their engineers/technical people who was much more helpful in answering some questions I had about their rechargable cells. True, their normal CS people don't know much, but they don't seem to BS the info and are at least willing to connect you to someone who can possibly provide an answer.
 

JimH

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,714
Location
San Jose, CA
That's our Newbie - no fear of death
Nadeani0.gif
smoker.gif
 

Brighteyez

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
3,963
Location
San Jose, CA
Thanks for the confirmation. It's getting a little difficult to keep track of all of these, and coupled with the often 'undocumented' changes that can occur with Chinese imports in both big name brand products, and the vanity branding market, I'm starting to wonder if the information that comes forth even from the most well-intended vendors may end up differing when the next shipment comes in. Really can't blame the retailer either as they're probably often not made aware of such changes.

jsr said:
I was told this by the owner of BatteryJunction who carries Tenergies when I was looking into Tenergy cells.
 

modamag

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,101
Location
Bay Area, CA
Thanx Newbie for the closeup and the "brave" venture.
Great Macro Pics :twothumbs

Now I know which parts it is that were left after the fire.
 

jsr

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,901
Location
socal
Brighteyez said:
Thanks for the confirmation. It's getting a little difficult to keep track of all of these, and coupled with the often 'undocumented' changes that can occur with Chinese imports in both big name brand products, and the vanity branding market, I'm starting to wonder if the information that comes forth even from the most well-intended vendors may end up differing when the next shipment comes in. Really can't blame the retailer either as they're probably often not made aware of such changes.

I agree, and it's difficult to verify the claims and time consuming to do so, of all the various brands, etc.

Another big thanks to Newbie for taking the risk (and saving me my eyebrows and whatever else would've burned off if I tried this).
 

Brighteyez

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
3,963
Location
San Jose, CA
Here, Here.
Hats off to him if he's experienced enough to do it.
Hats off to him if he's the only one foolish enough to do it. :D
Thank goodness we're not all so daring or there may be fewer of us ...

Very informative in either case!

jsr said:
Another big thanks to Newbie for taking the risk (and saving me my eyebrows and whatever else would've burned off if I tried this).
 

NewBie

*Retired*
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
4,944
Location
Oregon- United States of America
Actually, the white porous membrane is typically a polyolefin (or other fluorinated polymer, like UHMWPE) membrane that is designed to melt (or maybe swell would be a better word) a bit and close up it's pores in a localized shorted area. In

Molicel's secondary cells, there is an additional very high temperature plastic membrane that adds an additional safety margin, were they said the single low temp membrane had been known to fail due to temperature. The low temp was still necessary, as in a localized spot, the temperature may not reach high enough to swell/melt a higher temp membrane


Thanks for the kudos fellas.
 
Last edited:

picard

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
1,298
carrot said:
So these batteries are just rolls of... electrodes? I don't quite remember chemistry class.

I'm surprised... I thought there were pixies inside.

yeah, I really thought there were a dozen pixxies working hard pedaling stationary bicycles to generate power. :grin2:
 

NewBie

*Retired*
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
4,944
Location
Oregon- United States of America
Okay, instead of the Energizer/Surefire cell shown above, some have said the Duracell was identical. Well, it isn't.

It has a few of the same basics and that is where things depart:

dura1.jpg

dura2.jpg

dura3.jpg

dura4.jpg

dura5.jpg

dura6.jpg
 

SilverFox

Flashaholic
Joined
Jan 19, 2003
Messages
12,449
Location
Bellingham WA
Hello Newbie,

I can't seem to make out the vent spike that Duracell refers to on their exploded view. Is it there?

A question comes to mind... Are hundreds of contact points in a friction fit better than a single welded point?

Tom
 

chimo

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
1,905
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Newbie, thanks for another great disection. :goodjob:


SilverFox said:
A question comes to mind... Are hundreds of contact points in a friction fit better than a single welded point?
Tom

One benefit of this implementation if that the current should be more evenly distributed across the grid structure. It is also possible that this provides a better heat transfer to the top cap for thermal activation of the PTC.

Paul
 

NewBie

*Retired*
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
4,944
Location
Oregon- United States of America
SilverFox said:
Hello Newbie,

I can't seem to make out the vent spike that Duracell refers to on their exploded view. Is it there?

A question comes to mind... Are hundreds of contact points in a friction fit better than a single welded point?

Tom


I see no vent spike.


There is a "springyness" to the hundreds of individual contact points, which would be alot like having the tailcap battery spring in many flashlights, but hundreds of redunant ones.


I did notice the PTC in the Duracell battery showed no blemishes from being "overly" crimped like I saw in the SureFire/Energizer cells.
 

NewBie

*Retired*
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
4,944
Location
Oregon- United States of America
Due to some recent events of exploding 123 cells, I took some more pictures for another thread, but I'm going to also put them here, so everything is also in one concise thread.

Mod/Admin, if it is an issue, please holler.

-------------


Well, decided to take some more pictures for folks of the button top and it's construction on the SureFire/Energizer and Duracell batteries:

123dura.jpg

123dura1.jpg

123dura2.jpg


123energ.jpg

123ener1.jpg


I also ran another test, with a Duracell 123 that I cut open, and dropped in some water, at times it made more bubbles than you see in the picture, but that is about all that happened. It may be due to the limited rate at which the liquid water can actually enter into the tightly wrapped cell, which would be much different than a moisture filled cell that heats up...
123h2o2.jpg



Please folks, do NOT EVER try any of the stuff I am showing you, I've seen some of these cells violently throw flames and hot molten material like a rocket engine. I have some special 1/2" thick plexiglass that I do all this stuff behind, forced ventilation in an open area, and thick welders gloves, and I still wear a full face chemical shield and sealed goggles, and a few other safety precautions.
 
Top