Thanks. Okay, I am now sold regarding the Zebralight and sold about the floody H51 series. What might require a little push perhaps is between the 'c' and 'w' series. I understand that the 'c' series is meant to provide more "accurate colour". I do note that when I do hike at night, I am not exactly "sightseeing", but usually trying to get myself either back to civilisation (perhaps after witnessing the sunset), or a place to camp. So more critical than getting more accurate greens in the foliage, or brown in the rocks, is the ability to clearly see the sometime rocky/uneven trail is the most important aspect.
What I wonder is whether there is a material (i.e. practical - as opposed to theoretical) difference between the 'c' version and the 'w' in practice in light output. On paper, the 'w' version is much better on High settings including the strobe, and significantly weaker on M2 (strange). Since I am not familiar with light output measurements, I am not sure what is *needed* to be able to safely see the trail. Is it over 100? 60? 30? Under what circumstances will I need to be on H1 or H2? (The battery life on those mode are is too short, so I would hope that I would not need so much power given that I am walking, not running). Is either light more "comfortable" (at nearly the same temperature, I wouldn't expect there to be much difference)?
Well, I very much suspect that I am splitting hair here, and either would do be fine. Still, for my 6000 yen, I would like the "more useful" one, however minuscule the differences ^^;