SaabLuster, could you tell if the phosphor was suspended in silicone too, or if it might have been a different material? Perhaps a solvent or digester ought to be researched. The Nichia (not a cree, but I don't think I've seen this type of info on a cree DS) datasheet I have actually tells what the different parts' substrate materials are, generically, i.e. dome is silicone (doesn't say what it's doped with, or if it even HAS any additives), phosphor layer is phosphor suspended in silicone.
Yes Cree uses silicone as a binder for the phosphor. This means that any attempts to dissolve the dome away also dissolve the phosphor layer.
It does increase heat but it hasn't affected the maximum drive levels as much as I had anticipated.I had promised to do the beamshots but i didn't , i am planning to go out tomorrow for this.
If i understood well, you need two beamshots, from a dedomed xm-l led and a normal xm-l , facing a white wall to see the difference?From what angle?
I clearly measured 20-30% lumen drop output. I think that, as current increases, the difference gets higher. It is logical up to one point, i believe that the energy from the lost lumens is converted into heat, so we get higher temperatures on the core and a another performance drop. I am waiting for saablaster to confirm this statement.
Yes it makes a big difference with reflectors as well. I am about to begin offering just this. Hang tightIm curious if dedoming helps as much in say a p60/D26 sized reflector as much
as it does with an Aspheric. Maybe Vinh or Dave would start offering this as an option?
thanks for posting your results!!