Did more testing today with the DBS and the 3-stage Q5, I now have a 2-stage digital Q5 on the way which Dereelight says is a bit brighter than the 3-stage it replaced, so I'll post results when I get it.
Here are some results from the Q5, SMO reflector, freshly charged 18650. I have two lux meters now the DX meter, and I just got a meter, supposedly better (cost more than the DX) by Tes, the Tes 1332A.
DBS 3-Stage HI: DX = 19,300 TES = 26,200
DBS 3-Stage MED: DX= 9,050 TES = 12,350
DBS 3-Stage LOW: DX=2,280 TES = 3,120
To compare to lightreviews.info:
They have the CL1H V2 w/ 5-stage HI and OP at 5480 LUX
My meters with the same set up: DX = 3,540 TES = 4610
Lightreviews.info has the Tiablo A9S Q5 at 21380 for their max reading. So my TES meter, reading lower than lightreviews.info's meter, has a much higher LUX reading for the DBS 3-stage Q5.
If I add 19% to the reading my Tes meter gave for the CL1H 5-stage, I get the same figure lightreviews.info had for theirs. If I add 19% to the DBS reading I got on the tes, I come up wth 31,178. The interesting thing is that's about what I get with my Sekonic 408 meter, which gives an EV of 13.6, which translates to around 30-31k lux according to Sekonic's conversion chart.
I'd love to know what kind of light meter lightreviews.info is using and how accurate it is, etc. It would be nice if I could just add 19% to whatever reading I get with my Tes meter to get a more realistic reading. Or maybe lightreview.info's meter reads high? I find it interesting that their readings agree with my Sekonic 408 meter.