cheapbastard
Newly Enlightened
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 52
lol that is hilarious
Why do I say that? Put simply, much has been made in the popular culture about the "observer" needed to collapse the waveform - but this is just the problem of translating concepts into common language that I referred to earlier. What they are talking about in the act of "observing" is in fact measurement - which means interacting with the particle/wave in question (and thus bringing in issues of complimentary, entanglement, etc.)
Don't worry - no shooting.With the Delayed choice quantum eraser they measure regardless, but whether the resultant pattern is that of a particle or wave is dependant not on measuring, but on whether or not they "destroy" the results? This is also suppost to be proving the uncertaintly principle or whatever. I was watching a facinating leacture (youtube ) given in india where is said it's not a limitation on the measuring equipment, but a limitation imposed by physics. You just can't "know".