The terms "absolute white" and "Euro beam" still don't mean anything but whatever someone might want them to mean at the time.
You guys are just negative, sarcastic and boring, how could someone possibly have a discussion against you guys..
Don't forget 'pedantic'.You guys are just negative, sarcastic and boring, how could someone possibly have a discussion against you guys..
marketed with overhyped terms, glittering generalities without any real technical meaning, or acceptance in any industry. They look great on a webpage or in an ad, but they don't stand up to scrutiny. Other times, they use terms that have real meaning and look impressive (like "Xenon"), but there's no reason that the terms would need to be used, or the addition of such terms gives no real indication of the performance. A box of salt described as "microfractured halite Krystals(TM)" is just a box of salt. We know what halite is, but adding "microfractured" and using "Krystals(TM)" just hypes it up a bit. Similarly, a bag of pure cane sugar marked "Sodium Free!" and "0 Trans Fats!" is absolutely correct, but we already know cane sugar is sodium free and has 0 trans fats. Similarly, a light bulb with Xenon as part of the fill gas is really no big deal, but that word becomes a fixation point and people rally around it like the pennant of sports team from their area.
We're not being adversarial here, we're just injecting some facts and the occasional levity.
You guys are just negative, sarcastic and boring, how could someone possibly have a discussion against you guys..
Choose to be offended?
I'm not new into this business
If you we're having a discussion with me face to face and you were to start making fun of me, I would slap you in the face
or walk away
I regret ever putting up these pictures and my whole post here because it wasted my time
I work with these lights and test them in the field together with many other famous brands. So I do know what I'm talking about
Vision X is high quality brand and should be respected for that.
That may be so, but your misuse of terminology and adherence to notions that can't be supported by reality gives the appearance that you're just beginning on your journey towards knowledge of automotive lighting.
I'm not making fun of you.
Exactly right. (that almost looks like this)
From the linked article
So everything's billed as a "technology", whether it merits that description or not. Mostly not; I can say I'm going to "deploy lipid-disintegration surfactant and hemmed-microfiber absorptive technology to take my fenestral visual clarity to the next level," which sounds all cutting-edge and certainly worth money, but all it means in the real world is that I'm going to clean my windows with soapy water and a rag. Much less sexy, but hey, if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with BS and listen to the cash register ring.
Scheinwerfermann, I appreciate we have to work within the rules but I've just spent 10 minutes searching for these, without any luck. Like most on here I'm interested and curious about lights, especially new technology. I see forums, like this one as a means of sharing information of common interest. I'd like to think that we're mostly grown up enough to be able to tell the difference between overt advertising or even shilling against just sharing. Could we at least have the name of the company so we don't all waste our time searching page after page without having much idea of what we're looking for other than it is reasonably sure to use an SST-90? Would this be any different than posting up that Hella/Philips/Lightforce/Osram have a new product?