Panasonic CR123A's are rated at 1600mAh.
The Fenix 700mAh 16340 is good. I've got several. I have an older Eagletac 750mAh and the Fenix 700mAh had the same run time on a test I did. Not sure if the ET 750mAh is exaggerated or if my battery was just older or if the Fenix 700mAh is better than it says. My assumption is that the Fenix spec is its true capacity. The Olight 650mAh 16340 performed like a 650mAh battery. Those are the only brands of 16340 I've owned. I once had a Nitecore 14500 battery and it didn't last as long as the Fenix 14500, so I ditched those and I have avoided the Nitecore 650mAh 16340 battery. I know the Fenix 14500 battery uses the Sanyo/panasonic cell. Not sure what their 16340 is.Some brands like AW, Eagletac and Keeppower deliver around 650mAh at 500-1000mA draw.
I'm still waiting for someone to test the Fenix 16340 (700mAh rated) true capacity, as they seem promising.
Hi,
What are some quality CR123A batteries. I can see that there are some 1600mAh on ebay, but I suspect that that is false advertising.
I wasn't clear enough. I'm looking for a Li-ion (rechargeable), not lithium (non-rechargeable) batteries.
I don't mean to embarass you, but this is not a question of clarity. The mistake being made here is nominal and can and will result in explosion and/or injury.
CR123A cells are primary cells only, can not be recharged, and attempting to recharge them is a recipe for disaster.
There are a few chemistries for secondary rechargeable cells that are used in place of CR123A, and they all require not just understanding the differences, but require avoiding being even slightly inaccurate with the proper way to treat and charge and discharge them, and ignoring this will cost more in hospital bills than they are worth... so just go with primaries if you unwilling to learn some banal stuff, like about all these batteries.
You've come to the right place to find out what you need to know. The first thing you need to know is that semantics matters, and nominal mistakes lead to practical mistakes which lead to property damage and/or injury.
/finger wag
I don't mean to embarass you, but this is not a question of clarity. The mistake being made here is nominal and can and will result in explosion and/or injury.
CR123A cells are primary cells only, can not be recharged, and attempting to recharge them is a recipe for disaster.
There are a few chemistries for secondary rechargeable cells that are used in place of CR123A, and they all require not just understanding the differences, but require avoiding being even slightly inaccurate with the proper way to treat and charge and discharge them, and ignoring this will cost more in hospital bills than they are worth... so just go with primaries if you unwilling to learn some banal stuff, like about all these batteries.
You've come to the right place to find out what you need to know. The first thing you need to know is that semantics matters, and nominal mistakes lead to practical mistakes which lead to property damage and/or injury.
/finger wag