TRUE ΔT/Δt termination method consumer-grade NiMH AA/AAA chargers?

samgab

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
1,259
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
There doesn't seem to be many, if any, consumer grade NiMH chargers out there that use a true ΔT/Δt termination method for NiMH cells (delta of Temperature over delta of time).
I believe this is the best method of charge termination for NiMH cells, because there is a very direct and specific correlation between increase of cell temperature and when a cell becomes fully charged, due to the change in the electro-chemical reactions that happen within the cell.
Just Max Temp termination alone is no good, because it's dependent on ambient temperature, whereas ΔT/Δt makes the ambient starting temp irrelevant.
Also just Max V termination (with follow-up trickle charge) isn't great because NiMH cells vary in voltage at full SOC (dependent on age, brand, ESR, Temperature, rate of charge,etc), and you can't get a true read of when a cell is fully charged from max V.
-
ΔV is a quite good method too, but there is the risk of missing termination signal, particularly with slower charge rates.
But
ΔT/Δt works down to (relatively) quite low rates, and is really accurate, and it cares for the cells nicely, because it is Temp increases that do the most harm to NiMH cells when charged due to electrolyte drying out and pressure build up inside the cells, (more harmful than the actual rate of charge (0.5C, 1C, etc)). But you need good, accurate thermistors, and they need to make good thermal/physical contact to the side of the cell being charged. If a cell was not inserted properly, Temp based termination would fail (so you'd need a couple of failsafe termination methods, such as Max V, Max temp, and Max Time).

I don't know of any consumer AA/AAA chargers that use TRUE
ΔT/Δt termination, and I wonder why that is? Maybe it's patented (eg: http://www.google.com.au/patents/US5825159)?

eneloop%252520charge%252520chart%25252001OCT11.png
 

sbj

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
173
It requires more effort and is therefore more expensive to build in well functioning temperature sensors. Especially if the charger is designed for different cell sizes.

Until the internal temperature increase can be detected externally by a sensor, a certain time passes. Is this really faster than -ΔV?
Clearly, the -ΔV detection is only a consequence of the temperature increase. But that immediately.

 

Overclocker

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
1,585
Location
Philippines
temp sensors on practically all consumer chargers are half-assed i.e. behind the plastic chassis, possibly w/ a bit of thermal grease

perhaps a non-contact method like infrared could be employed to sense the temperature directly off of the cell. shouldn't be expensive at all. however the motivation to build such a charger might not be there ;)
 
Top