It seems this process has not worked with flashlights. Seems strange since it is applied to firearms.
I have a Malkoff MD2, and an HDS 170 in orange, love them, and these are my first and only queen's, not safe queen's, but house queen's as I do enjoy using them even if it is at home. However, even with the light duty they enjoy, there are nicks, and marks.
Sad, really, I thought this would liberate us from black, and drab lights. We still have bare metal which is always nice no matter the type of metal.
I have been trying to find out if these lights were finished in a single shop, or by different ones. Really, with all the discussion, and evidence we have proves that this has failed, I feel some explanation is in order since we all paid a premium for the finish, and it did not live up to the PT Barnum claims of long wear...the irony is it was the opposite, with awful wear and protection.
This industry chimes in with the word "Honor" quite often, until something like this takes place...
For me, if it did not work, then fine, but just admit it. I think that is the right thing to do. And, this needs to come from the shop or shops that did the work first, dealers that sold the product are victims as well.
I have a feeling a large part of this is poor QC in the application, and prep. work. Could have been poor training?
Hope we can finally get the truth on this. I would be happy if there was just a sincere response for the problem. I understand things do happen. I would be fine with this.
Sincerely,
RL