Olight M21 first impression

Tom_123

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
119
Location
Berlin, Germany
The Olight M20 was one of my first premium lights and I still like it.
Therefore, I couldn't resist getting the successor, the Olight M21 as well.

What do you get:

The Olight M21 comes in a plastic case instead of the usual carton box.
The case includes the following accessories:
Holster, Lanyard, magazine for CR123 batteries, GID spare boot, spare o-rings
and a flat ring as a replacement for the cigar grip ring.
So you get basically the same accessories that came with the M20.

M21_01.jpg


M21_02.jpg


The outside and the interface:
Besides the new head and emitter, there are not much differences between the M21 and
its predecessor .
The battery tube and tail cap are the same and will fit both lights.

M21_04.jpg


From left to right: Olight M21, Olight M20, Wolf Eyes Sniper MC-E, ThruNite Catapult
M21_03.jpg


In my hand:
M21_05.jpg


No changes were made at the user interface.
The clicky turns the light on and off and offers momentary activation.
Twisting the head will change between the four mode, which are also the same in both light:
High, mid, low, strobe.
Sadly one difference is, that I couldn't manage to disassemble the head of the M21.

Specifications:
( "*" = informations from Olight)

*Luminus SST 50 emitter
Output: *500 Lumen according to Olight,
about 300- 350 lumen OTF would be my first wild guess.

*Batteries: 2x CR123, 2x 16340, 1x 18650, 1x17670

Weight with 1x18650 battery: 169g (Olight M20 166g)
Current draw with AW 18650 (no-load voltage 4.2V): about 1,3A
Current draw with 2xCR123 (no-load voltage 6,47V): about 0,97 A

*IP68 water resistant

Beamshots:

The M21 has a colder tint, the beam is more on the floodier side.
As for the throw, in a first visual comperation I couldn't see much difference.
But as visual comparisons are prone to misinterpretations, don't quote me here.

Left: Olight M20, right Olight M21
Beam_01.jpg


Left: Wolf Eyes Sniper MC-E, right: Olight M21
Beam_02.jpg


Runtimes:

For now here is the first runtime chart with AW 18650 batteries.
The Olight M21 IMHO has a good regulation and in consideration of the higher output
also a good runtime.
I'll post some runtime charts with CR 123 as well, as soon as I'll have all the data together.

Edit***********************************
My WE Sniper died short after the runtime test, so I'm not sure if she was still
100% ok while I did the runtime.
So please take this chart with a grain of salt. Sorry for that.
**************************************

Runtime_AW18650.jpg


Runtime charts with CR123 Surefire Batteries and AW 16340 rechargeables:

Runtime_123.jpg


Conclusion:

Given that the Olight M21 will proof to be as reliable as my M20,
I think this light is a winner.
It's surely not a "power light" which could play in the same league with the Trunite Catapult
or the Solarforce L900m.
But being still compact enough for EDC and 50% cheaper than the Wolf-Eyes Sniper MC-E,
I think the Olight M21 would be a good choice for people who are looking for a well build
and bright multi purpose light for EDC, Camping, walking the dog and the like.


Final words:

The runtime charts where made with my home build integrated sphere
and a cheap Extech luxmeter.
A picture of my setup can be found here:

http://s671.photobucket.com/albums/vv76/_Thomas/Forum Fotos/?action=view&current=UK_2.jpg

The lights where cooled by a fan during the runtime.

English isn't my first language, so please excuse some typos and weird grammar.

regards
Thomas
 
Last edited:

Bass

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
408
Location
UK
Nice job. Excellent write up and first impressions of this interesting light. :thumbsup: Great pictures and beam tint shots. This must of taken you some time to do.

Your english is excellent. If you had not of said, I would of presumed it was your first language!
 

droeun

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
110
Wow thanks for the great review!

So the M21 is actually regulated with 18650? I didn't know that. That's definitely an improvement over the M20 if it is.
 

ZRXBILL

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
296
Location
Oklahoma
Very nice review. Thanks for posting it here.

The tint, not being an ugly green, and regulation are both much nicer than on the M20.:twothumbs
 

DimeRazorback

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
2,994
Location
Australia
Great review!

Thank you for the charts and beamshots with comparisons, especially with the M20... lets just say that your review has sparked a little interest in the M21 for me know :devil:

I must stay strong :D
 

EngrPaul

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
3,678
Location
PA
It looks like there is something else in the picture. Is that a ring to replace the cigar grip?

Thanks for doing runtimes. I wonder how AW 2600mA*h high-current capabl cells will test vs. the 2200 mA*h you likely used (?). Higher output? Longer runtime? Both?

Thanks Thomas, good job!

The case includes the following accessories:
Holster, Lanyard, magazine for CR123 batteries, GID spare boot, spare o-rings.


M21_02.jpg
 

PhantomPhoton

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
3,116
Location
NV
I also agree on the apparent regulation from the 18650 being a great thing. Must be due to the low VF/ low drive current of the SST50. I know that this isn't intended to be a super high output light so after seeing the runtime graphs I'm giving this light a second look now. :)
 

Painful Chafe

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Messages
406
It looks like there is something else in the picture. Is that a ring to replace the cigar grip?

Thanks for doing runtimes. I wonder how AW 2600mA*h high-current capabl cells will test vs. the 2200 mA*h you likely used (?). Higher output? Longer runtime? Both?

Thanks Thomas, good job!

Yes. The ring is to use instead of the cigar hold ring.

Thanks for this review. I have the M21 and like it. I would love to see a throw comparison with other lights.
 

berry580

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
1,138
Location
Sydney, Australia
thank you for the overview, apparently its roughly 8k lux @ 1m, not a big thrower, but considering its spot's size, it should be quite useful.
 

Tom_123

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
119
Location
Berlin, Germany
Thank you all for the nice words.

It looks like there is something else in the picture. Is that a ring to replace the cigar grip?
Exactly, sorry I have forgotten to mention it, I'll correct this.

I wonder how AW 2600mA*h high-current capabl cells will test vs. the 2200 mA*h you likely used (?). Higher output? Longer runtime? Both?
Sorry again, I don't have these 2600 mAh AWs, all the runtimes were made
with 2200 mAh AWs.
I recon a 2600 mAh battery will mainly improve the runtime.

Outdoor beamshots are a problem. I'm living in the middle of the city
It's pretty cold outside and quite hard to find dark places nearby.:candle:
Will see what I can do, but no promise made.

Still working at the CR123/16340 runtimes, so stay tuned.
 

NewTech

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
42
TOM_123.
The M-21 comes with OP reflector.
Any possible with SMO reflector beam shots ?.

Thanks.
 

DimeRazorback

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
2,994
Location
Australia
Are you sure?

It looks like you just have to unscrew the bezel, just like the M20... only thing is, that Olight don't sell a smooth reflector for it :nana:
 
Top