Cree XR-E: Twice as Bright or Twice the Runtime?

Bearcat

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
415
Location
Germantown, TN USA
Am I in the minority in thinking that the real advantage of the XR-E is twice the runtime? I would be tickled to death to have a small 1- AAA keychain light with a XR-E LED that had the same light levels as my new Safe-Light I got from Wits-End. Do any of you flashlight gurus know what the runtimes would be for such a light?

 
Last edited:

regulator

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
1,221
I'm with you on the runtime...

I think the nicest thing with the new Cree's is the efficiency to get more runtime. Basically, find a flashlight you like with the amount of brightness that you like as well. Make this model now with a Cree and it instantly gives more runtime - kinda like getting more light for free.

I posted my thread below. My perfect EDC upgrade is the form factor of the AAA light (I like the style of the Jetbeam AAA and LOP) with flat regulation of 4-5 hours on a Lithium cell. A low and high setting are nice but not as important to me. A simple 2-stage is prefered with a low giving 10 hours.
 

amanichen

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
335
Location
Virginia
Bearcat said:
Am I in the minority in thinking that the real advantage of the XR-E is twice the runtime? I would be tickled to death to have a small 1- AAA keychain light with a XR-E LED that had the same light levels as my new Safe-Light I got from Wits-End. Do any of you flashlight gurus know what the runtimes would be for such a light?

The real advantage is that the LED is more efficient. Do with it what you like. With the explosion of affordable multi-level lights, brightness and runtime can coexist in the same package.
 

LED_Thrift

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
1,874
Location
Northern NJ, USA
Bearcat said:
Am I in the minority in thinking that the real advantage of the XR-E is twice the runtime? ...

No, you are not alone in liking lights with good efficiency. All the lights I really like have good efficiency for their level of brightness.
 

asdalton

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
1,722
Location
Northeast Oklahoma
Outdoors Fanatic said:
Twice the runtime. Crees are not twice as bright as Luxeon Vs.

True, but now we can get the output of a Luxeon V with the focusability of a Luxeon III (and twice the Lux V runtime and half of the heat load). It's twice the output of the Luxeon III, which is Luxeon with the highest output that can also be focused well.

I always considered the Luxeon V to be a limited-use product due to its large die size, although a few flashlights (like the Surefire L5) make good use of the Lux V despite its limitations.
 

InfidelCastro

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
2,266
Location
USA
To a point, I don't really care about efficiency. That's what they make rechargeable or extra batteries for. I want as bright as possible, (without doing damage to the LED).
 

yaesumofo

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
3,701
Location
Eastern Pacific, LAX DM03 sw actual
I love the idea that these new Next gen emitters have the overhead to be as bright or brighter than the "standard" Lux III emitters while improving upon run times.
I have a Mc ????PD coming with a Seoul P4 U-Bin part which will run as bright as my LUX III based light on much less power.
This is a bright light with great runtime. The best of both worlds.

Soon we will have even brighter lights with great runtime!!
I want both.

Yaesumofo
 

2xTrinity

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
2,386
Location
California
InfidelCastro said:
To a point, I don't really care about efficiency. That's what they make rechargeable or extra batteries for. I want as bright as possible, (without doing damage to the LED).
So in other words, you'd take the tradeoff of giving up runtime to gain extra brightness. One major point worth noting is that the added efficiency has an additional benefit even beside brighter light at the same power, or longer runtime at the same output. More electrical energy is being emitted as light, rather than forming waste heat in the LED. Because less waste heat is being produced, assuming the same heat tolerance, it should be possible to either concentrate the same amount of light into a smaller die for more throw, or increase the power while keeping temperature constant.
 

Bullzeyebill

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
12,164
Location
CA
I'll go alone with less heat with Cree. My CM Cree modded KL6 at 1 amp to the led runs cool, whereas my KL6 with the lux V ran fairly hot, and a WxxS modded to that same KL6, at 1 amp to led, was really hot, and you could watch the output drop, drop, drop (bounce with lightmeter). The Cree at one amp is 15% brighter, barely getting a little warm and holds its output like a rock.

Bill
 

Bearcat

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
415
Location
Germantown, TN USA
I wonder how bright a 1-AAA Cree XR-E keychain light would be with a 10 hour runtime that is fully regulated. Would that be like a Fenix EO that is four times as bright?
 

AdamW

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
186
Bearcat said:
I wonder how bright a 1-AAA Cree XR-E keychain light would be with a 10 hour runtime that is fully regulated. Would that be like a Fenix EO that is four times as bright?

I had to use a twice as bright Cree XR-E to read the small font.
 

PlayboyJoeShmoe

Flashaholic
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Messages
11,041
Location
Shepherd, TX (where dat?)
How about twice the runtime of my P1, with a boost of even more light on demand?

I'm looking to acquire a Jetbeam 1AA Cree. I've never even had a multi level light before (well, unless you count 5MM stuff).

But frankly, I've never found my P1 TOO bright as a work EDC. I'd be less inclined to use it around the house. That seems to scream for multi levels!
 

easilyled

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
7,252
Location
Middlesex, UK
Surely, with a light with 2 or more levels you can have both.

More runtime on a lower level at the same brightness as before with
a luxeon, or more brightness at a higher level with the same runtime
as before.

Why should these be contradictory?
 

LightScene

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 12, 2003
Messages
939
Better run time is nice, but I prefer brighter output. I can easily carry some extra batteries, but there's nothing I can do about maximum brightness.
 

Bearcat

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
415
Location
Germantown, TN USA
I guess that I am just survival minded, because long runtimes interest me more than brightness does. I just can not see having more than twice the light that is needed at the expense of runtime. Just recently I gave a friend of mine a Safe-Light that I ordered from Wits-End. When I asked him if it was enough light to find his way through the woods in the dark to his deer stand, he stated that he only used the low setting, because the high setting was more light than he needed to find his way and he did not want to spook any deer.

I am just curious, what specific need is there for a 1-AAA keychain light to be much brighter than say the Safe-Light on its highest setting that would warrant a shorter runtime?
 
Last edited:

InfidelCastro

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
2,266
Location
USA
Bearcat said:
I wonder how bright a 1-AAA Cree XR-E keychain light would be with a 10 hour runtime that is fully regulated. Would that be like a Fenix EO that is four times as bright?


I can only read this while in edit mode. Might want to try a larger font.
 
Top