Thing is though, the City is not doing anything at all to encourage people to get rid of their cars. Whether they seldom use them or need them on a daily basis to get to and from work. The City is just idiotically and obnoxiously waging a war against cars and their drivers. It would be a different story if the City, for example, actually expanded public transportation to very busy and crowded NYC neighborhoods that have been horribly under serviced for over 50 years! City's not doing that. Not at all.
I totally agree. Counting the new segment of the SAS to 125th Street, we will have spent over $10 billion on subway expansion in Manhattan, the borough which needs it the least. Meanwhile, large parts of the city, including where I live, are nowhere near a subway. You actually have it good compared to me in that you're only 24 blocks from a subway. I'm 2.7 miles from the nearest one. Before we implemented the Metrocard with free subway-to-bus transfers I used to walk that distance both ways most days to avoid the second fare. Besides, the bus didn't save much time over walking. The wait was often 10 minutes or more, the ride itself 10 to 20 minutes, depending upon the time of day. Walking took me maybe 35 minutes tops. BTW, the bus connection to the subway more or less doubles the travel time to Manhattan. I get on at Forest Hills, which is an express stop on the Queens Blvd. line. Only three more stops until Manhattan-Roosevelt Avenue, Queens Plaza, and 23rd Ely. The bus takes 15 minutes on average to go 2.7 miles. The train
moves. It covers I think 7.3 miles in 17-18 minutes. It might be even faster now. With CBTC they bumped the speeds on the Queens Blvd. line to 50 mph.
There was talk of building the so-called second subway before WWII which would have put nearly everywhere in NYC within 1 mile of a subway station. Unfortunately, the war came, and after that we lost interest in public transit in this country. The $10+ billion spent on the SAS could have covered a lot of Queens and Brooklyn still lacking subway service, especially if built at the going world rates of ~$200 million per mile.
I'm somewhat sympathetic when the city makes driving more difficult without also offering viable alternatives. We might not be able to expand the subway right now, but we can offer better coverage right now with buses, along with more frequent midday and late night service.
As for congestion pricing, my prediction is the MTA will get the money, spend most of it on another round of retroactive pension increases, not service expansions, then come back, cup in hand, begging for more. Better public transit in this city starts with making the MTA more accountable. As they are now, they're basically a black hole which sucks up money with little to show for it.