I don't understand why you are so open to giving away $100. If a review doesn't meet the criteria set then why give it the $100. I was under the impression that the $100 was for compensation for purchasing the light from extrembeam itself but some may not be comfortable giving them that much money anyway. I would do it but I can see just as many possible complaints about me doing a review from my own viewpoint as it is clearly not entirely impartial.
I would try contacting some well known reviewers who have a lot of reference lights to compare to, or people who often disassemble lights and report back. I would recommend contacting selfbuilt, HKJ, and people like ergotelis and vinhnguyen possibly. You could well find some very good reviewers over at BLF too who are technically minded and have good experience with budget lights qualities and deficiencies, after all most reviews over there already include comparisons to the cheaper ***fire lights anyway.
1) I never really said the 100 bucks is for any specific purpose, I said it is 100 bucks. do whatever you want with it
2) side by side review, I said
3) subwoofer asked, I said no...but to make sure I do not look like a chump [and there really is no
100 dollars], I am gonna man-up and send 100 bucks to 'someone', to prove I am not just a windbag
so if someone does it better and a review that generates less controversy (in other words public opinion
should be 'yeah it was a neutral un-biased review') that person gets the 100 bucks
if no one steps up, the 100 bucks has to go to someone or I am a lying b**ch, right ?
I am not funding anything, I just want someone with the skills and review skills to maybe
have some incentive to 'work on the extremebeam controversy' in a little more detail than
a standard review, since extremebeam pumps 'a little bit more hype' into marketing