Would you like a car that, when it sense it over heating in the slightest, just shut down in the middle of the freeway? Or, as the design should be, rely on the user to make an informed decision on what they are doing?
My l2d rebel 100 and q5 runs much cooler than my old p4. Never gets very hot at all. I remember i fell asleep with the old l2d on turbo beneath my pillow. Don't ask me how I just woke up because it was burning my hand.
Hehe. Don't get me wrong I love the Q5 but the thing sure gets hot when left on turbo inside a well insulated coat pocket - really hot. So yes DO be careful where it is when its on turbo mode!
BTW. "mighty82", Do you personally prefer the tint of the r100 to the q5 outside? I'm just wondering if a warmer tint is better for outdoor work and mountainbiking.
Thanks
Would you like a car that, when it sense it over heating in the slightest, just shut down in the middle of the freeway? Or, as the design should be, rely on the user to make an informed decision on what they are doing?
I'm sure a car would operate for 2.5 hours after it has started to overheat and as soon as you change the coolant it'll be perfectly fine. The analogy doesn't work. Plus some cars can actually reduce power to limp home the Caddy Northstar engine comes to mind
And i'm sure it wouldn't. Friend of mine hit a badger, taking out the cooling to his engine completely. As soon as he could stop, he did; the engine was permanently damaged (the cylinder columns had warped or something) and the whole engine had to be replaced after less than 5 minutes of driving with no cooling.
I'd give it 15 minutes before an engine with no cooling tore itself apart (literally).
Erm, "drives emitter far beyond it's rated specs". No it doesn't- it drives it at 700ma for 180 emitter lumens. That's well within specs. However, overheating is a fair point. IMHO, providing it doesn't get hot to hold, it's fine. Not like it'll get used for 50,000 hours anyway!
@ hand: Although my anecdotal evidence is by no means a good, randomised, normalised sample, IMO it's good enough to make me sure that driving a car without cooling for 2.5 hours will cause permanent damage.
Since it won't cause permanent damage, perhaps you want to empty your coolant and drive around for 2.5 hours to prove me wrong?
Handlo, do own a L2D that you can speak from experience?I didn't say you're wrong. I was saying your/your friend's experience isn't necessarily typical of the duration w/o coolant before having serious problems. One might have an anecdotal evidence that he fell off a roof and got away with scratches and I might argue that might not necessarily be typical, or plain "untypical" if I have the data from similar accidents.
That's not encouraging people to go off the roof.
Doesn't really matter, but I thought I'd say it. It's not "air" in between double paned windows, it's argon gas, completely different.You may be true on several counts. (I do have a lot to learn about flashlights and thermodynamics) I am curious where you get hand having 24x thermal transfer than air. Any data on that? Air is obviously a good insulator, as everyone knows that trapped air in the form of styrofoam, house insulation and double paned windows, is quite a good insulator. While not as good as water (back to your radiator example), air-cooled engines perform quite well when there is air flow.
Doesn't really matter, but I thought I'd say it. It's not "air" in between double paned windows, it's argon gas, completely different.
Oh and as much as I agree with Handlobraesing that implementing thermal regulation (it's embedded in most regulator chips already, for crying out loud) would be better engineering, the few products that did weren't quite as well received as the ones that didn't.