Fivemega, (
and I would never want to argue with YOU about your bulb!) I'm looking at it like this. 3 X IMR is about 12.6v when
under no load and hot off a charge. Now, put it under load for only a couple of minutes and it's probably more like 11.6v running which is not pushing the 1909 as hard as I would like to push it. The 1185, on the other hand, is at that point running at about 11.9v which is right at the bleeding edge of
and is therefore noticeable whiter. I have played with these combinations side by side enough to see that the 1909 just isn't as white on 3 x IMR for very long.
Here is some testing I did using 3 x 26500s and this bulb. This was done with a reworked stock switch, not the AW switch.
Resting voltage was 12.56 or 4.187v per cell.
Initial running voltage (at the moment of startup) was 12.1v.
Here is the running voltage drop over time.
Min. Voltage Temp
1 11.7
2 11.55
3 11.43 134
4 11.34
5 11.25 142
6 11.14
7 11.05 157
8 10.97
After only 2 minutes we're at 11.55v running and down to 11.25v after 5. Now granted, this was done with 26500s instead of 26650s but I don't think there would be much (if any) difference for the first few minutes.
So as we see, the batteries only supply 12v+ to the 1909 but for a moment. They can't supply this rate for long under a 5.5a load.
My 1909 host really only has the resistance of the AW switch plus the resistance of the batteries and their contacts. I use direct battery to copper in the tailcap....no spring. I have to be VERY careful with the 1185 bulbs in this host, running them on medium for a bit before going to high when the cells are charged to 4.2v. Even doing this I will occasionally murder an 1185. However, the 1909, in my experience, is no problem to go directly to high with this soft start switch.
So, what I'm thinking is that perhaps starting a set of 4 x LiFePO4 cells at just the right charge voltage would provide a very flat output as compared to using IMRs...almost like it's regulated to ~12.4v! Could it live if done carefully? What do you think?