Re: How does the discharge curves of Eneloop Pros compare to standard AA & AAA Eneloo
Yes many things come into play. That's the reason I think it's not that simple just to transfer the test results made under laboratory conditions with real life conditions.
It's no secret I personally am a little sceptical with those cycle numbers. But as said I find them useful nevertheless.
If you wanna know how they come up with the numbers. You can see it in the link below under section 7.4.1.1 ( Table 9 ).
As you can see both charge and discharge are done under gentle rates followed up by a break-in every 50 cycle. The airflow around the cells is probably better since forced ventilation is permitted to keep temp. under 35°C if necessary. The voltage will never come below 1.0 volt during discharge.
On the other hand. There isn't much resting time like there would be in almost any cases under real life conditions. And the cells will probably get overcharged before they regularly get drained down to 1.0 volt every 50 cycle. However whether this is actually damaging under these low charging rates combined with the limited period of time I think is questionable. But I'm not sure about this.
http://www.cnlumos.com/lumos/Battery Knowledge/Battery Standards/IEC61951-2-2003.pdf
After reading my comment about the 2100 cycles, i didn't realize that DoD % could factor into how many cycles you get out of the battery. They could be 2100 cycles and you would only be discharging them to about 50% while draining them to near death may have less cycles but as you said would be more robust than the 1500 cycle Eneloops.
Yes many things come into play. That's the reason I think it's not that simple just to transfer the test results made under laboratory conditions with real life conditions.
It's no secret I personally am a little sceptical with those cycle numbers. But as said I find them useful nevertheless.
If you wanna know how they come up with the numbers. You can see it in the link below under section 7.4.1.1 ( Table 9 ).
As you can see both charge and discharge are done under gentle rates followed up by a break-in every 50 cycle. The airflow around the cells is probably better since forced ventilation is permitted to keep temp. under 35°C if necessary. The voltage will never come below 1.0 volt during discharge.
On the other hand. There isn't much resting time like there would be in almost any cases under real life conditions. And the cells will probably get overcharged before they regularly get drained down to 1.0 volt every 50 cycle. However whether this is actually damaging under these low charging rates combined with the limited period of time I think is questionable. But I'm not sure about this.
http://www.cnlumos.com/lumos/Battery Knowledge/Battery Standards/IEC61951-2-2003.pdf
Last edited: