Any chance that we will see new tests of the ST with the broad voltage circuit.
The ST with the broad voltage circuit functions like the Jet-III M, reviewed by selfbuilt here:
https://www.candlepowerforums.com/threads/211631
Agreed, there doesn't seem to be much need to test a broad voltage version of the ST - it should perform identically to the Jet-III M I tested in that link above. (sorry adnj, Mos Eisley spaceport is as far as I can take you
).
Yet from selfbuilts review the non-BOV's lightbox number was 2.2 yet the BOV's was 0.2, 10 times lower. Runtime should be much longer.
Yes, the broad-range circuit is capable of incredibly low output - roughly on par with my Novatac 120P (which quotes its minimum as 0.08 lumens). At that level, I would expect typical 18650 or 2xRCR runtimes to be well in excess of 200 hours (assuming reasonable efficiency). Of course, I don't plan to test that.
A key point to consider is that there is likely to be quite large variability in runtime at these levels among different samples (due to emitter Vf variation). As discussed in my Nitecore Extreme and other reviews, it seems that variability on these continuously-variable PWM lights can be potentially as large as an order of magnitude from one sample to the next, at these very low drive levels. I suspect 200+ hours is just a conservative estimate on their part, keeping it as a lower limit (i.e. your sample could be 200 hours ... or 2000 hours ... etc.).
How does the ST handle heat? I want to be able to run it on max for extended times while being held in my hand. Is that doable with this light?
Should be doable, as long as you keep it in your hand ... I've used my regular ST for up to 10mins at a stretch, and while it gets quite warm, it is still carry-able. Left unattended though, I would expect it to get uncomfortably hot on max.