Thanks for the review, it looks interesting!
I think I am gonna go with the XT11GT which has a smaller head and the USB port built right in - the magnetic charger seems to me more like a bug that has been promoted to a feature
I'm a little curious how well the magnetic charger will hold up too, especially should someone try charging it after coming in from the rain or something, without letting it dry well enough first. However, I think I'd trust it a lot more than a micro usb port. I really hate that micro usb seems to have become the new standard. I have to put my reading glasses on just to make sure I'm not inserting the things upside down on my phone or tablet and it's not really so much smaller than a mini usb to justify the added aggravation. Not to mention micro-usb ports seem much more prone to failure, according to all the reports I've read from ports going bad on phones and tablets. But, maybe most of those are from people who need reading glasses too. Regardless, in addition to being easier to hook up, the magnetic charger at least seems to be potentially more reliable. Time will tell...
I did find it curious that I couldn't charge my phone off the micro usb cable included with the Klarus. I've never run into a compatibility issue with micro usb cables themselves before. Sometimes the usb-ac adapter might have firmware installed specifically for the device it was intended to be used with, but the cables being made different too is just getting ridiculous.
That said, I'm actually tempted to think I might like the XT11GT better too. I love the 12, but the extra lumens seem more like the "gimmick" here to me, as the light heats up so fast it can't sustain the extra output for any practical length of time. It's really more like an 800 lumen light with 1600 lumen bonus mode. Which is awesome in and of itself. However the reflector being designed for the added throw makes for a narrower beam. It's not a huge distinction, but it's definitely worth considering. And the added reach of the 12 seems to be moving beyond what's needed for human eyesight. At my age, I need reading glasses, but I still have perfect visibility at a distance. Comparing this with a 1000 lumen rated Lumintop TD16 in a wide open field, it was clear the Klarus could reach farther, but I felt like I needed a scope to really appreciate the extra reach. Where the Lumintop lit up more of my immediate surroundings, about just as brightly, and could sustain it for closer to 5 minutes. I can usually get where I'm going or do what I need with a flashlight in five minutes, not so much in only one minute. But, again, if it can sustain 800 lumens for a lot longer as tests show, assuming the heat subsides or doesn't make it too fragile when dropped, I'm good with that. I would have preferred lights high mode have been at least 600 lumens though, if not 800. I'd just assume go straight to 800 lumens rather than be potentially distracted by the light heating up in my hand while I'm holding a gun with the other.
My main criticism with this light though, is with what Klarus dubs a "tactical ring". It's not very large. Even with thin leather gloves, it's a little difficult to find the ring quickly between your fingers. With much thicker Kevlar lined gloves, it's even harder to feel. Furthermore, for a tactical hold using the ring, the tail clicky MUST protrude beyond the butt of the light, as it's activated by the palm of your hand, not your thumb like you'd use holding in an arm-bar position. So the "tactical ring" is effectively, just an anti-roll ring. There's little "tactical" about it. The thought that Klarus apparently doesn't know the difference makes me lose confidence in other aspects of their design. But I didn't intend it for duty use, so I'm happy for what I bought it for.