Thank you
VERY much for the Kodak Pre-Charged results
Just a point of curiosity - don't the results from last 2 - cycles 1 & 2 - almost seems as if the battery numbers/sequence had been rotated by one ie: # 4, 1, 2, 3?
Any ideas why battery #1 from cycles 1 & 2 seem much closer to battery #4 in the initial readings?
I've been very interested in the Kodak Pre-Charged and have done a hodge-podge of ad-hoc experiments comparing these to eneloops in
eneloop vs. Kodak Pre-Charged Voltage Maintenance.
From this I can say that eneloops seem to hold/maintain a higher operating voltage under load by about 2-5%. But for most practical usage, eneloops and Kodak Pre-Charged seem to be about equal - probably because the total energy capacity (mW-hrs) is probably very similar - ie: the higher operating voltage of the eneloop compensates for the slightly higher current capacity of the KPC - giving equal/similar energy capacity.