Suggestions on how to improve Armytek Flashlights:

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Woods Walker, those are photos of the narrow beam of the Predator, right?
 

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
I think I'd freak out in the complete darkness of the woods if that narrow beam was all I had left to navigate with. In that context, I'd rather be stuck with only an ET G25C2 or even S200C2 in neutral than a Predator.
 

Woods Walker

The Wood is cut, The Bacon is cooked, Now it’s tim
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,433
Location
New England woods.
Fantastic pics,would love to do some proper rough camping/walking on my own. I do have confidence in the viking although i have not tested it to extremes. Just that feel and not skipped a beat so far. Been in the garden pond (which is very cold),been camping so far that's it other than round the house stuff.

I would contact AT if not already for a new switch presuming all is tight inside and threads cleaned etc etc(the norm stuff).

Have you had the switch apart? instructions they do have :laughing:

I know it was the switch as exchanging the switches between the two lights exposed the issue. I returned the light to the retailer asking for an exchange but got a refund instead. So there goes the Viking. Last night almost pulled the trigger on a ArmyTek headlamp but my issues with these two lights and other factors made me reconsider. Personally I am a mostly performance kinda person. White lettering isn't even really noticed but I totally understand that aspect of gear ownership. Some people have reported getting lights without any instructions if I read their posts correctly. The programming instructions weren't really included with the 2.5 Pro. Also the order of UI with the standard predator is listed totally backwards. Took me a bit of time to work that out. LOL! These are easy to fix issues. I think removing the programming is an attempt to clean up UI bugs as well and reduce user errors and misunderstandings. Reliability and durability must take center stage IMHO or this brand will just be another Nitecore (no offense towards those who like that brand).
 

Woods Walker

The Wood is cut, The Bacon is cooked, Now it’s tim
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,433
Location
New England woods.
Woods Walker, those are photos of the narrow beam of the Predator, right?

No the Viking Pro. In an enclosed canopy and bushwhacking situation many flashlight beams look the same even those with greater flood.

I think I'd freak out in the complete darkness of the woods if that narrow beam was all I had left to navigate with. In that context, I'd rather be stuck with only an ET G25C2 or even S200C2 in neutral than a Predator.

I sleep out all the time so yea get used to the night. It's not so bad and during some weather conditions it's better IMHO. For most of my dark woods activities I use a headlamp but find the need occasionally for a throw light. That's why I am here right now. :)
 

desmobob

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
328
Location
Upstate NY - Lake George region
I have a Tiara Pro C1, a Wizard Pro, a Viking Pro 2.5 and a Predator Pro 2.5 and all function and perform as expected (or better). I do wish the programming instructions for the Predator/Viking 2.5 Pros was a bit more user-friendly. I bought both of those lights for the programming feature but it seems so daunting, I haven't got around to attempting it yet!

Take it easy,
Bob
 

ArmyTek

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
804
Location
Berlin, Germany
I have a Tiara Pro C1, a Wizard Pro, a Viking Pro 2.5 and a Predator Pro 2.5 and all function and perform as expected (or better). I do wish the programming instructions for the Predator/Viking 2.5 Pros was a bit more user-friendly. I bought both of those lights for the programming feature but it seems so daunting, I haven't got around to attempting it yet!

Take it easy,
Bob

Thank you, Bob! I remember that you have almost a full line of our flashlights. :)

Ask any question you are interested in.
 

ArmyTek

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
804
Location
Berlin, Germany
Share your opinion with us!

!!! WE NEED YOUR OPINION !!!

Dear friends! We want to know your point of view on one issue.

Now we are gathering the feedback to decide what shall we (or shall not) improve in the temperature indication of our lights.


As many of you know at the moment we have a real-time active temperature detector in Wizard Pro. And when the temperature reaches critical level the brightness of the flashlight decreases till the flashlight cools down and then output rises again.
In conditions of good air-cooling the flashlight usually doesn't heat up to critical temperature and the brightness remains constant for the whole operation time. But with ambient temperature of about 25-30°C the flashlight delivers light in Maximum mode for about 6-10 minutes and then the brightness steps down for similar period of time. After cooling-down (provided that battery voltage is sufficient) the brightness increases to the Maximum mode again. This stepping goes cyclically to maintain the user's safety and the flashlight's functionality.
Some of our clients don't like this cyclic steppings, that's why we decided to discuss it with you also.
We can't avoid heating up in a compact flashlight of such brightness. We could make a timer for stepping down in order to avoid overheating but that's not what we want to offer our clients and doesn't corresponds to our policy in flashlights' production at all.
Using real-time temperature measurements we are able to offer you constant brightness at High modes and we see advantages in it:
- if you use the light underwater, on a bike etc. where it will not heat up critically you get constant brightness without steppings down
- after stepping down the brightness rises to the Max brightness again
At the other hand, we also understand that some people would prefer if the brightness will step down once or decrease gradually rather than experience these "falls & rises" of brightness. But if we refuse of it and add timer or discard full stabilization the flashlight will deliver Max output only for a short period of time (3-minute timers are usually chosen by Chinese manufacturers - we don't want to be like them=)). And we want our Pro lights to have full stabilization in all modes including Maximum.
So we want to hear your opinions and suggestions – what would you prefer to see in the lights and maybe what other variants you can suggest. Our main intention is to provide both safety for user & flashlight and quality bright constant light.
This information will be helpful not only for reconsideration of Wizard Pro driver, but also for all 18650-operated models with high light outputs.

Looking forward to hear all you opinions & suggestions!
 

WarRaven

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
2,135
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
Re: Share your opinion with us!

Hello, in my opinion, keep the temperature step down.
It's a winner by technology capabilities and for equipment endurance\longevity.

Thank you, have a great day.
 

FlashlightR

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
93
Share your opinion with us!

Hi, maybee you could use a PID controller technique like Zebralight does? It works very good.

And an advice: perform good tests before release the light on the market.... I had three faulty units of both the normal and the pro version (v1.5 and v2). Just my opinion. Have a good day!
 
Last edited:

WalkIntoTheLight

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
3,967
Location
Canada
Re: Share your opinion with us!

If you use a step-down from maximum to the next level down, I'd rather the light just stay in that lower mode, rather than stepping up again to max when the temperature drops. Jumping up and down is annoying.

If you implement finer control (like Zebralight's PID, as mentioned), then it's good to ramp down and up gradually, as temperature permits. So in that case, keep output at the brightest permitted.
 

scs

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
1,803
Re: Share your opinion with us!

If you use a step-down from maximum to the next level down, I'd rather the light just stay in that lower mode, rather than stepping up again to max when the temperature drops. Jumping up and down is annoying.

If you implement finer control (like Zebralight's PID, as mentioned), then it's good to ramp down and up gradually, as temperature permits. So in that case, keep output at the brightest permitted.

I second the gradual ramp down and up. Ramping doesn't have to be continuous. It can be in discrete steps, but the steps have to be small enough to be not noticeable.

OR consider lowering the max output to somewhere around 500-600 OTF and in doing so PERHAPS eliminate the need for temperature management.
 

texas cop

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
520
Location
Texas
Re: Share your opinion with us!

I'd like to see part commonality and a chart of which part fit which. I've bought a few of you light; Dobermann, Viking and the Predator. While the part on the Viking and Predator can interchange the Dobermann stands alone. I've got 2 pressure switches and the Dobermann is out with a different thread. Additional parts like 2-18650 body tubes for extended run times.
 

Woods Walker

The Wood is cut, The Bacon is cooked, Now it’s tim
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
5,433
Location
New England woods.
Re: Share your opinion with us!

Whatever you do just make sure it works as intended. That's what is important.
 

viciousLUX

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
17
Location
Finland
Re: Share your opinion with us!

Please NO timer stepdowns.. I hate that! I don't have any experience about your active thermal managment but that sounds good to me..

I want my flashlight stays hi when I use it in places where light can cool down itself... Like in the woods at cold winter night or heavy rain etc. Which are places I need all light I can get.. And if I have to turn light off and on to get full brightness because it stepped down even it doesn't have to.. It's annoying.
 

SkinnyCow

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
27
Re: Share your opinion with us!

No step down period! If the light states constant brightness in all modes then it must stay at max until the battery is low. No step down or flashing. Why pushing for high lumens then implement step down then up? The only thing that makes armytek differ from other Chinese lights is the constant brightness on all modes until the battery is really low. I would not mind if your light is 700-800 lumens on MAX and stay that way till the end.
 

Lumencrazy

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
369
Re: Share your opinion with us!

No step down period! If the light states constant brightness in all modes then it must stay at max until the battery is low. No step down or flashing. Why pushing for high lumens then implement step down then up? The only thing that makes armytek differ from other Chinese lights is the constant brightness on all modes until the battery is really low. I would not mind if your light is 700-800 lumens on MAX and stay that way till the end.

High temperatures will!!! damage the led. Flashlights are somewhat limited in their ability to dissipate heat. If you check Cree's spec sheets, you will see that we are asking (demanding with our credit cards) that manufacturers make brighter and brighter flashlights. In many cases they are pushing the limits of temperature beyond the design recommendations. If something goes wrong we will blame them in return.
 

kj2

Flashaholic
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
8,082
Location
The Netherlands
Re: Share your opinion with us!

(3-minute timers are usually chosen by Chinese manufacturers
-​
we don't want to be like them
=)).​
And where are AT lights made..:whistle:

Back on topic. I'm fine with a step-down, but if it's done in small steps that would be awesome. Not a big drop, but small steps during several seconds/minutes. That way it's hardly noticeable, and the light can cool down.
 

ArmyTek

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
804
Location
Berlin, Germany
Re: Share your opinion with us!

I'd like to see part commonality and a chart of which part fit which. I've bought a few of you light; Dobermann, Viking and the Predator. While the part on the Viking and Predator can interchange the Dobermann stands alone. I've got 2 pressure switches and the Dobermann is out with a different thread. Additional parts like 2-18650 body tubes for extended run times.


The full chart of parts' compatibility will be available later when we finish the production of Partner v3 & Prime v2 (customized with XP-L LEDs). After that we also plan to put some parts on sale separately to enable our customers to combine different bodies with their favourite flashlights.


At the moment I can give you some basic information on Tactical lights you're asking about:
- All older versions of tactical lights (v2 / v2.5 etc.) as well as Barracuda & Partner v1 have the threads different from those in the latest versions and models (v3, Barracuda & Partner v2, Dobermann). That's why the remote switch for Predator v2.5 doesn't match with Dobermann.
- New Predator v3, Viking v3, Barracuda v2, Dobermann & Partner v2 models have the same threads and can be used with the same remote switch (v2).
- If your're going to combine the flashlight's head with a different body please take into account the minimal & maximal voltage the model can maintain (the voltage is usually written at the head or body of the flashlight.
 

ArmyTek

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
804
Location
Berlin, Germany
Re: Share your opinion with us!

Thank you all for your opinions and advice! That has given us the ideas and grounds for reconsideration of thermal control in our lights =) We are going to discuss the possibilities with our engineers and make some changes in future flashlights. What conclusions we can draw now:


1. Of course we are not going to use any timers! Constant brightness is the main idea we're going to "fight for till the end".


2. Thank you all for your opinions and advice! That has given us the ideas and grounds for reconsideration of thermal control in our lights =) We are going to discuss the possibilities with our engineers and make some changes in future flashlights. What conclusions we can draw now:


1. Of course we are not going to use any timers! Constant brightness is the main idea we're going to "fight for till the end". We will definitely keep the full stabilization so that in the conditions of good air-cooling (in winter, on a bike or underwater etc.) Pro-flashlights will deliver constant light even with almost discharged battery.


2. We use the similar algorithm to maintain the temperature under the critical limit as Zebralight's PID but in our lights brightness "ups & downs" are larger and thus noticeable. We will make them smaller so they'll be gradual & unnoticeable. That will enable us to provide the maximum allowable brightness as well as keep the flashlight and your hands (or head) safe =)
3. We do not plan to decrease the Max outputs in this situation as that what is very important for many of our customers. We have plenty of models with different brightness & power sources so everyone can choose what he prefers. The thermal management issue regards mostly to high-power & compact lights with constant brightness such as Wizard or Viking Pro, that are too bright not to overheat & and too small to loose heat fast enough.
 
Top