I've noticed that alot of you guys are saying that you don't really
mind them on women if they are "small", "in inconspicuous places", "original", "have meaning", etc....
As a woman with many tattoos, I couldn't agree more... oddly enough. I think it's absolutely unattractive for women to have tats on their upper arms. Tribal armbands on
either sex is extremely
UNoriginal to me. Tats on women's chests? Only if they are small and can be hidden in an evening gown if desired. And seeing as how we're being honest here, skulls and flames and mechanical parts ripping out of flesh... along with nautical stars and satanical beings... complete turn-off... on either sex.
Yes, tats should definately have meaning. "Flash" off the walls of a tat studio... decided on at the very last minute after walking into the studio and saying, "I want a tat"... never a good idea.
There is only one other person in the world who has and will ever have the same tat as I do... my daughter. She and I have 3 matching ones... and they are all original creations of ours... and have very deep meaning... for both of us. Most of my other ones have been drawn by my husband. And then there's the one that has a very close tie to CPF....