I think it is great to see other companies creating LED emitters. I wish that Sunlite became more public, or would allow us to buy their emitters separately. Their products do seem interesting, as they seem to focus on developing LEDs mainly for flashlights, while the top manufacturers have general lighting customers in mind (Lumileds, Cree). Actually, is that correct? I guess I do not know enough about this company. I wish they had more presence here on the CPF (instead of just through you, Ryan) to increase awareness in their products.
Anyway, even if there is not physical gap in the LED, there will still be a dark spot on the emitting surface in ths shape of a cross. Unfortunately, because of this cross, where the two darker lines meet, is right in the optical center of the LED. So, when you focus the reflector so the focal point is lined up axially above or below the optical center, you will still get that notorious "donut hole" in the flashlight's beam. This will have a donut hole like every other quad die of the past, but I wonder if the donut hole will be less evident since the gap was removed and the only limiting factor left is the effect of the passivation peripheral. Lumiled's Luxeon V did not have that bad of a donut, and the SSC's P7 had a donut that wasn't too unbearable. However, because the MC-E uses dies with a confomal coating, and because the gap is actually larger than with the P7, the beam is rather horrid with a smooth reflector. If you make comparable measurements of the die image of these multi-die emitters, you will see how the gap size vary.
It would be neat to see them produce a LED in response to Phlatlight's newer products. If Sunlite makes their own emitters, then what if they use a new process to grow larger sized dies? I thought that Sunlite had a model of emitter with a slightly larger die, or am I thinking of another manufacturer? A 5mm^2 or 9mm^2 would be nice. Actually, I can imagine that it would be more practical to push 9 of their dies together like they did with this new quad die. With 9 dies together, there would not be a donut hole in the flashlight beam, but instead maybe a ring in the beam that would appear slightly dimmer (think a bigger donut hole, but most of the hole is filled with the light of the center die). This would happen because the there would be a die in the optical center, then moving outwards, there would be a grid of darker lines surrounding it, and finally a perimeter of dies.
Finally, could you share if Sunlite uses Flip Chip technology like Lumileds uses with their TFFC-based products? This would explain the absence of bonding wires. Without bond wires, how are the dies electrically connected? Lumileds uses electrical contacts on the underside of the die, and uses vias, and Cree still did not flip their chips yet (why not?) and still mount their dies on SiC and use bond wires. Because Sunlite has their dies physically touching, then that must mean that all four dies are wired in parallel, right? A gap was neccesary with Lumiled's Luxeon V because two sets of dies were wired in series while two were in parallel. I still wonder why Lumileds do not have a Rebel-like product (using an alumina substrate) where they connect four touching dies in parallel. I guess this is because of the cost and practicality to use multiple, separate, and matched dies prohibits this...
Thanks for the info on the Sunlite emitters. Too bad you could not encourage one of the employees to join the CPF to share their products, or maybe more in depth info (just specs and basic info that you would see on a datasheet).
-Tony