Fun times, reflowed a U2 2S bin onto my MCPCB epoxied to my heatsink, attached a Ahorton aspheric lens, and got 29000 CP (lux @ 1 m) peak beam intensity vs the 23500 CP peak beam intensity the T6 was getting. A 23% increase in lux output is much more then expected, even though I was doing my best to keep the testing identical. Same lense/mcpcb/heatsink/lux meter/both measured at 5m distance, and I was getting the peak beam intensity from the same area of the projected die image. (Around the bond wires) I'll re-flow the T6 back on when I get a chance, maybe cutter didnt have the central heat pad fully soldered or something like that. (They put the T6 down originally, not me)
I was using a LX1330B light meter. the person on amazon was trying to sell it as an Extech instrument, but there is no Extech branding on it, or no listing of a light meter on Extech's website. I dont know how this meter compares to others, but regardless of that, the comparsion between the 2 LEDs should be valid.
Now for the real trick, do you trust DX enough to actually be shipping U2 LEDs? I may be a bit cynical, but I wouldnt.
EDIT: redid the T6 lux measurement, got 24750 CP for the T6, making 29000CP for the U2 only a 17% increase. The T6 is a 1A tint bin, vs a 2S tint bin, making the U2~5700k and the T6 ~6500K in color temp, which probably explains the difference between 14% theoretical vs 17% empirical. (Sensitivity of the lux meter more meant for incan/warm whites vs cool white)
So yes, they are brighter, is it noticable by eye? Maybe maybe not, depends on the on the light it goes into. Would it hurt anything getting the brighter bin if it was in a tint you like? Probably not, I wouldnt pay more then 14% extra for the theoretical 14% extra performance.