Paul1149,
Thanks for posting all this. It's interesting.
I make this device to be an "active" NVD, as opposed to a passive device such as a Gen 3 IIT. That would explain the higher resolution than with IIT devices. The downside is the illumination beam, even if not visible to the unaided eye, what about to IIT and other NVD? What frequency of light is the this device sensitive too, and what frequency can be produced by the illuminator?
I'm a big fan of passive devices, but not the big price tag that good ones usually come with, in addition to the lesser resolution compared to digital. It seems these digital devices are improving in the five years or so since I quit following NVD equipment (If one thinks that being a flashaholic is expensive, try keeping up with the NVD Joneses!). I don't even have the best Gen 3 and it broke the bank to do that! It has served me well though. As long as the illum. is not visible to the unaided eye, if this product delivers great resolution at this price, I may think about getting one!