Australian Customs = :(

LEDBE
DimeRazorback

DimeRazorback

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
2,994
Location
Australia
So after almost 2 months of fearing my CQC-8 being lost, I receive a letter today that it will be destroyed as it was deemed a "Flick Knife" :scowl:

The pivot was tightened by the seller, so I would have to assume they decided to tamper with it.

Not very happy as not only am I out the cash, I am also now concerned about any implications this may have on my records.

Do any of you Aussie's know if a warning letter for trying to import "illegal goods" gets recorded or reported??

They say that it is "recorded", and I assume that would mean on their systems. However I am wondering if it will also show on criminal records?


Cheers! :thumbsup:
 
Try join the Australian Knife collectors club or similar and get the paperwork done, or you can buy from an Aussie dealer. Another alternative is to have the seller disassemble the knife and ship it as knife parts.
 
I was going to join a club, but the CQC-8 was going to be all I needed for a while so I didn't bother :ohgeez:

Isn't hindsight great! :)

Do you know anything about the warnings and such??
 
DimeRazorback said:
I was going to join a club, but the CQC-8 was going to be all I needed for a while so I didn't bother :ohgeez:

Isn't hindsight great! :)

Do you know anything about the warnings and such??
Click to expand...

Sorry Jared, only ever got a 2 dollar DX laser confiscated off me. Don't know much about claims and stuff.
 
R@ndom said:
Sorry Jared, only ever got a 2 dollar DX laser confiscated off me. Don't know much about claims and stuff.
Click to expand...

I once got a letter with my 2 dollar DX knife informing me that it was a prohibited weapon from CBSA.

Boy was I confused. I had a paralegal friend call to ask and the agent was being a real prick. Did I enjoy hearing her chew that guy out. :D

Turns out he was being overzealous and someone above his paygrade over ruled him.
 
DimeRazorback said:
So after almost 2 months of fearing my CQC-8 being lost, I receive a letter today that it will be destroyed as it was deemed a "Flick Knife" :scowl:

The pivot was tightened by the seller, so I would have to assume they decided to tamper with it.
Click to expand...
Australian Customs Officers are very well informed and in general know what's what. Those knives are designed to operate in a certain way and they know it too. One look at the brand allows them to cross reference the manufacturer's website which clearly shows the intended operation of the knife.

A lot more of this type of stuff comes into Australia in the mail than you'd imagine and there is a lot of experience in both detecting it and judging what it really is.

To answer your question as to whether a record will be kept, yes, Australian Customs Service keeps records of Prohibited Imports that are detained, destroyed or otherwise dealt with.

In very loose terms, prohibited flick knives are defined as kives with sprung blades or with blades that open "automatically" by centrifugal force or gravity. In essence - and these following are MY words, not the service's - those prohibitions will cover many articulated knive whose blade is not locked in the closed position by either a spring or a postive lock. Merely having a pivot tightened does not stop a knife (generally) from being opened by centrifugal force and thus being subject to the schedule.

This is my opinion alone and merely speculation, but the fact that you only received a destruction letter means either that the service is going easy on you as a first offender (th emost likely) or they otherwise believe your knife fits into the schedule's definition only at the edges so you may not have realised, otherwise to my mind there was the potential for you being prosecuted under the Customs Act with the ensuing likelihood of the criminal record that often comes with that.

Frankly, my personal opinion is that you're lucky. As to what records the service will keep regarding you and where that leaves you in regards to scrutiny of further importations by mail it would be improper to discuss here but once again, they are going easy on you so you may be lucky in regards to future consequences but I'd seriously advise that you don't consider attempting to import this type of stuff again without prior approval.
 
Last edited:
That really sucks!

As Dave said, they do keep records. A friend of mine who runs a knife business has had it confirmed to him that there are watchlists, a good number of his packages get opened these days. Come to think of it, about a quarter of the knife collectors I know who import stuff on a regular basis have figured they're on that list.

That said, I'm not sure if you'd be on the watchlist for that one incident, but if you start seeing a higher frequency of parcels with that "Opened by Customs" sticker on them, you'll know.

If there's a knife we're iffy about, we just ask ACS and maybe get a permit just to be safe. Here's their email address: [email protected]
 
Th232 said:
If there's a knife we're iffy about, we just ask ACS and maybe get a permit just to be safe. Here's their email address: [email protected]
Click to expand...
and to add something to that, please remember that the Australian Customs Service interprets the law requiring a permit from the minister to import goods to which schedule 2 applies as meaning that the permit must exist at the time the goods are landed, not when they get to the consignee - so to ensure there's no potential for a "technical" breach even on "permitted" goods, you need the ministerial permit PRIOR to the goods getting to the international mail exchange.
 
JaguarDave-in-Oz said:
Australian Customs Officers are very well informed and in general know what's what. Those knives are designed to operate in a certain way and they know it too. One look at the brand allows them to cross reference the manufacturer's website which clearly shows the intended operation of the knife.

A lot more of this type of stuff comes into Australia in the mail than you'd imagine and there is a lot of experience in both detecting it and judging what it really is.

To answer your question as to whether a record will be kept, yes, Australian Customs Service keeps records of Prohibited Imports that are detained, destroyed or otherwise dealt with.

In very loose terms, prohibited flick knives are defined as kives with sprung blades or with blades that open "automatically" by centrifugal force or gravity. In essence - and these following are MY words, not the service's - those prohibitions will cover many articulated knive whose blade is not locked in the closed position by either a spring or a postive lock. Merely having a pivot tightened does not stop a knife (generally) from being opened by centrifugal force and thus being subject to the schedule.

This is my opinion alone and merely speculation, but the fact that you only received a destruction letter means either that the service is going easy on you as a first offender (th emost likely) or they otherwise believe your knife fits into the schedule's definition only at the edges so you may not have realised, otherwise to my mind there was the potential for you being prosecuted under the Customs Act with the ensuing likelihood of the criminal record that often comes with that.

Frankly, my personal opinion is that you're lucky. As to what records the service will keep regarding you and where that leaves you in regards to scrutiny of further importations by mail it would be improper to discuss here but once again, they are going easy on you so you may be lucky in regards to future consequences but I'd seriously advise that you don't consider attempting to import this type of stuff again without prior approval.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the info mate.

I will say however, that I read up on all of the legislation before I decided to get one from the US (as you can buy them locally, but for twice the price) and I did not see it as a breach in any form. So I was taken by surprise to be honest.
If I had any thought that it would get seized, I wouldn't of attempted to import it.
My CQC-7B got through fine, so there is definitely inconsistencies at play, and yes it was checked by an Officer and deemed legal.

At the end of the day, this isn't a flick knife, nor an assisted opening knife, but I respect the decision the officer made.

Like I stated, this was going to be my last knife purchase for a long while, so it is a bad note to end on :laughing:

Could I inquire as to where you got this first hand information?
 
Last edited:
DimeRazorback said:
I will say however, that I read up on all of the legislation before I decided to get one from the US (as you can buy them locally, but for twice the price) and I did not see it as a breach in any form. So I was taken by surprise to be honest.
If I had any thought that it would get seized, I wouldn't of attempted to import it.

At the end of the day, this isn't a flick knife, nor an assisted opening knife, but I respect the decision the officer made.
Click to expand...
The Customs law doesn't look at "assisted opening" as such but an officer looks to see if the knife fits the following definition as per the law itself:

Flick knives or similar devices, made of any material, that have a blade folded or recessed into the handle which opens automatically by:
(a) gravity or centrifugal force; or
(b) pressure applied to a button, spring or device in or attached to the handle of the device

If you feel you have a strong case that proves your knife does not fit that definition I suggest you make immediate contact with the department and make your case.

I'm not able to advise on any aspect of that other than from a personal perspective to say that if I was the officer concerned in intercepting such a device I'd be wanting to interpret it as fitting the definition (because my personal feelign is that such things ARE "similar devices" opening by centrifugal force and should be prohibited) but whether the department itself has policy advice or legal precedent (case law) regarding these particular knives or if yours is merely the subject of an ad hoc decision I couldn't guess.

DimeRazorback said:
Could I inquire as to where you got this first hand information?
Click to expand...
I guess you can enquire.......

I am a retired Customs Officer but please don't take that as an opportunity to ask more specific detail in regards to how these things are treated operationally within the department because I'd be stepping into very murky waters since I signed a binding confidentiality agreement when I left and I'd find it morally wrong to do so anyway.
 
Thank you for the information mate, much appreciated :thumbsup:

No, I don't plan on fighting it :laughing:
 
Australian customs officers are basically arbitrary and inconsistent. You can try to import a knife that is perfectly legal and they will confiscate it. Other people can import the same legal knife, have customs inspect it and have it pass. Basically, for any given officer there is no motivation to give the importer an even break, they are always better off seizing it. They can get into trouble for not seizing, say by someone showing off what they got past customs but if they seize they can point a large pile of "dangerous" weapons they caught and how well they are doing their jobs.

The system is carefully rigged against people who import. If you read the card you got instead of your knife they tell you that you can appeal their decision but if you lose they are obliged to prosecute you. So thousands of dollars of legal bills, a possible large fine or prison, versus your $6 DX knife.

I wouldn't worry about importing a knife or three and having them taken and having your details recorded. They will not come and kick down your door in the middle of the night unless you are clearly taking the ****, anything less just isn't worth their while investigating.

Australia has some of the most liberal import duty/taxation rules in the world ($900 worth of goods free if they are not for commercial purposes), but their handling of knives is objectionable.
 
Attack on Australian customs removed.
Norm

This new attack on knives is nothing more than finishing up the complete pacification and disarming of the Australian population. It has NOTHING to do with safety or reducing crime.

That being said. I heard that if a knife is dissembled, customs wont be able to seize it. Is this true? Can anyone who KNOWS tell me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HI

A few points, you will NOT get a permit for a knife Customs have 'deemed' to be a 'flick knife' The Local Police need to get on board to issue such a permit and they will NOT go against Customs.

Customs apply an absurd test that can ONLY be done AFTER the knife arrives, this test has many variations and Customs Officers are NOT trained in it and 'make' up their own versions in addition they keep testing with more and more force till knife opens a total breach of natural Justice. Also they can and have loosened the pivot of knives (I have it in writting from them).

The test itself is not applicable to the Regulations as it does not use Centrafugal Force nor is it a AUTOMATIC opening.

If you dont want to depute the Customs notice that the knife is seized then EVERYONE should make a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman and their Local Federal MP it costs nothing and will NOT result in any Court case, also complain about this abuse of power by Customs to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity.

They cannot be permited to continue to take knives and harass innocent citizens who have NO WAY to KNOW what knife will pass or fail this absurd test performed AFTER the knife arrives.

Also place a claim for the cost of the goods seized see the leglisation below.

CUSTOMS ACT 1901 - SECT 4AB
Compensation for acquisition of property
(1) If:
(a) this Act would result in an acquisition of property; and
(b) any provision of this Act would not be valid, apart from this section, because a particular person has not been compensated;
the Commonwealth must pay that person:
(c) a reasonable amount of compensation agreed on between the person and the Commonwealth; or
(d) failing agreement--a reasonable amount of compensation determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) Any damages or compensation recovered, or other remedy given, in a proceeding begun otherwise than under this section must be taken into account in assessing compensation payable in a proceeding begun under this section and arising out of the same event or transaction.
(3) In this section:
"acquisition of property" has the same meaning as in paragraph 51(xxxi) of the Constitution.
(4) The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated for the purposes of making payments under this section.

Australian Constitution - Section 51 - Legislative powers of the Parliament
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:-
(xxxi.) The acquisition of property on just terms from any State or person for any purpose in respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws:

MK
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top