MrBenchmark
Enlightened
Re: Flashlight Recommendations -- Suggestions Welc
[ QUOTE ]
Haesslich said:
[ QUOTE ]
MrBenchmark said:
Where I live, walking outdoors, my eyes are almost never really well dark adapted.
[/ QUOTE ]
If you're anywhere where man has been, which means highways or cities, villages or even farms, your eyes aren't going to get fully light-adapted unless you're indoors and in a room with no windows. The point is the the rhopsodin CAN be destroyed even with exposure to this faint level of light, but that the destruction is so minimal compared to that of any artificially produced light that it's almost not worth talking about... Red is used most frequently because it doesn't destroy rhopsodin, but it kills your ability to differentiate color because you need to use the rods to pick most of those up, which means you're stuck depending on photopic vision, which depends on the cones and has better acuity and color differentiation... but which is useless once the light level drops below a specific point.
[/ QUOTE ]
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gifWell, it's sort of pointless to talk about being completely dark adapted - if there's no light whatsoever, then your dark adaptation doesn't really matter... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif (I know it's not really pointless - it is possible to use this to see fainter things than one would normally be able to see.)
When I said "never fully dark adapted" - I was being charitable to my city - I meant "probably not dark adapted at all..." There is so much light around me that I suspect much of the time my scotopic vision is doing relatively little to help, but there's not enough light for my photopic vision to really work efficiently, either. Unless I'm in a parking lot - then it's bright enought that I can read the newspaper. Of course much of that light ends up going straight up, which isn't too helpful.
Sorry, we kinda drifted off-topic here. Does anyone besides astronomers and pilots commonly use red light anymore?
[ QUOTE ]
Haesslich said:
[ QUOTE ]
MrBenchmark said:
Where I live, walking outdoors, my eyes are almost never really well dark adapted.
[/ QUOTE ]
If you're anywhere where man has been, which means highways or cities, villages or even farms, your eyes aren't going to get fully light-adapted unless you're indoors and in a room with no windows. The point is the the rhopsodin CAN be destroyed even with exposure to this faint level of light, but that the destruction is so minimal compared to that of any artificially produced light that it's almost not worth talking about... Red is used most frequently because it doesn't destroy rhopsodin, but it kills your ability to differentiate color because you need to use the rods to pick most of those up, which means you're stuck depending on photopic vision, which depends on the cones and has better acuity and color differentiation... but which is useless once the light level drops below a specific point.
[/ QUOTE ]
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gifWell, it's sort of pointless to talk about being completely dark adapted - if there's no light whatsoever, then your dark adaptation doesn't really matter... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif (I know it's not really pointless - it is possible to use this to see fainter things than one would normally be able to see.)
When I said "never fully dark adapted" - I was being charitable to my city - I meant "probably not dark adapted at all..." There is so much light around me that I suspect much of the time my scotopic vision is doing relatively little to help, but there's not enough light for my photopic vision to really work efficiently, either. Unless I'm in a parking lot - then it's bright enought that I can read the newspaper. Of course much of that light ends up going straight up, which isn't too helpful.
Sorry, we kinda drifted off-topic here. Does anyone besides astronomers and pilots commonly use red light anymore?