Um, not sure what to think about this product, perhaps it’s miss informed advertisement, but according to their data this thing does not make sense. Example at maximum focus the beam is supposedly 45mm in diameter at 1 foot “304.79mm” that would give a beam divergence of 8.5 degrees, while in a no side spill light that’s not to bad, with say 60 lumens “somewhat around 20mw:thinking:” it could probably throw 400 yards, but the Tiablo A9 S makes a 4.5 degree beam that will throw 500+ yards. Also on it’s wide setting the light would have a beam diameter of 530mm, which would make for a 120 degree beam, that’s all flood, last I checked you can’t get 60 lumens of flood to go 400 yards:laughing:, in fact I don’t think you could get 60 lumens at 8.5 degrees to go 400 yards. So judging the fact that these stats must be wrong one must conclude on their own about it’s maximum performance. First the only way 60 lumens are going 400 yards is if it’s at least a 2.5 or smaller degree beam. That is much smaller then the Tiablo A9 S’s beam so if you think it’s beam is not practical for normal purposes, then the ND-5’s beam will be even worse. Lastly if a regular 5mw laser can go 2 miles and this 20mw laser can go 5 miles one must concur that’s it’s minimum beam diameter would be about twice that of a 5mw laser and twice as intense, so at maximum focus this is a laser and no longer a flashlight:o.
That’s my two cents:whistle:.
This is of course ignoring the fact the beam is green “yuck:green:”.