Previous L4s ? ? ?

To my understanding yes.
When SF released the L4 they're IS was calibrated for incandecent lights,so they basically just low balled a guess at 60 lumens.
Later on they made more accurate tests and changed the packaging to 100 lumens which i think is still conservative.
 
As I understand it, 1996alnl is correct.
SureFire has used the best LEDs it can. As LED technology improves it is possible to obtain sufficient quantities of more efficient and/or higher output LEDs so there has tended to be a base-line from which performance increases.
With regards to SureFire's LuxeonV lights such as the L2, L4, L5, L6, L7 their initial rating was a ball-park one performed quickly to get the rating into the catalogue at the time. It took SureFire some time to resource testing a sufficient quantity of production samples in order to be confident they could increase the rating.
I believe in general terms one can assume SureFire output ratings can have "at least" in front rather than the ratings be considered a maximum possible value.
 

Latest posts

Top