I knew that would be a knee jerk post! :clap:
Potential to cause seizures and causes seizure are not the same. I never have read a decent study that validated that theory. Never seen it or met someone in the medical profession that has seen it or met a patient that has experienced a seizure from a strobe in 10 years, 4 hospitals and 5 states. I'm sure it's possible, like a 50 year old pregnant woman. Highly improbable. Like cold air causing a person to get ill.
If I cause seizures to someone that is choking me, I can treat that too. Panic button brings the cops to the door in five to ten minutes. A long time to hold your breath. Plus you have to drag the patient out of their room and drag them to the nurses station to push the panic button and it's hard when they are choking you. So if you suffer from reactive seizures, please tell me before you initiate the nurse choking maneuver.
If you are right I'll disable the strobe mode I promise. It is something we at work have debated many times with nurses and physicians. Seriously though, you find a study to back up your point of view then we'll talk. Question what you know, words to live by.
Edit-
It is difficult to control for all the variables and do a good study of photo sensitive seizures obviously, but the inclusion of pseudo seizures and not controlling for other variables makes the very very rare really rare. If people are susceptible to photo seizures, they are not affected from 3 to 15htz, my strobe is set at 10htz ( to account for questionable data ) and I use it for defense when body language, verbal tones, location in the room and a plethora of other preventative measures have failed and I am in mortal danger. You would have to see the ER and how it is set up to understand how light can go from one room to another without lighting the hall. -No unnecessary exposure to random individuals (possibly 1 out of 4000 teenagers) There is a time and place for all things. I was foolhardy to think I could just drop such a "bombshell" and it would not stir confusion and reactions. I'm glad that you responded. It irritated me at first. "You are not from the medical field how dare you" was my basic and egocentric response. Yours is a common response based on a common understanding of a very complex topic. Should someone have a seizure after I have used my light at work I could imagine having to convince a jury of people that have a common understanding of such a complex topic that I did not cause the seizure. I can just hear myself saying, "But your honor it's only 10htz!" Arguably, a jury acquitted OJ not because of science but a better team of lawyers. I have disabled my strobe tonight because I don't want to hope my lawyer is better than someone else's lawyer. (Also after reading about pulse width modulation I estimate that a light that is constantly bright is more dissuasive than a light that is bright for only 10htz :) ) I am struggling, really struggling against a pathological habit of sarcasm so bear with me.
and remember class, the air goes in and out, the blood goes round and round and all bleeding stops always. (there's a joke there... at the end)