<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Size15s:
On highbeam, I did not melt the Lexan lens after 5 minutes - although it was very hot.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I've seen a post here or the Surefire forum where someone did melt their lens at around 5mins use. Surefire replaced the unit and suggested he not do that.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Size15s:
I think the TailCap switch is perfectly located. It's also a two-stage switch so placing it near the Bezel would create major problems.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
At this point I'm reserving judgement. I'll see what I think when I have mine and use it a bit. I suspect I'm going to be a little less picky than KT regarding the ergonomics. Also, I wasn't suggesting they lose the switch at the tailcap, but was thinking adding a additional one. As for the engineering, I suspect Surefire could pull it off.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Size15s:
On the size front, they are a lot smaller then you expect. Being the largest released SureFire , it's still smaller then many other flashlights. None can match it's output.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I didn't mean to suggest it was big. I would say it compares very favorable when compared to a Magcharger and as Al says, functionally wise, there is nothing to compare it to.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Size15s:
If you need 500Lu+ for any extended length of time, perhaps current SureFires are not the right lights for your application. To make it small, the runtime has to reduce.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'm not complaining that it only has 20 mins of runtime. What I don't like is I can use it on high for 20 mins. I think this was an acceptable tradeoff with the 12PM, but I think the 10X should at least be as good as the M6 in this regard.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Size15s:
I agree, the 10X really does require a Pyrex Lens. Shock isolation would be great if it didn't increase the Bezel size too much.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I think the M6 is the benchmark in this respect. It is very small and they integrated the shock isolation. I don't see any reason the 10X should not be as good as the M6. After all, the 10X came out after the M6 and the 10X was designed from scratch. No baggage to bring along.
-john