mmace1
Enlightened
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 363
Give me a sign. I prefer the wider spill of the Quark, but the higher runtime/brightness of the PA40 is appealing. Especially as really - I have no practical purpose for this light. At best, I'll be night hiking for an hour at a time nearby with it. It's just for fun. I also like having essentially an updated version of my first CPF light - the Streamlight Propoly 4xAA Luxeon.
That said, the Quark has a low-low (never had before). And...I've considered a Quark 2xAA ever since the first one came out, yet have never quite gotten one. It's also cheaper but eh...I'm resisted buying any McGizmos, and Surefire doesn't appeal to me...so compared to my main hobby (travel), this one is doing pretty OK cost-wise.
I also have a vague idea that the Jetbeam PA40 neutral is unusually cool for a neutral? I've never had a neutral before. That then again - that said....I've decided to get a Quark mini 2xAA neutral, just so I can have an exact-comparison (once I find out the respective color temps) with my current Quark 2xAA mini R5.
Bleh...can anyone make any sense out of this situation and advise? Or just wing it, that can be useful too.
That said, the Quark has a low-low (never had before). And...I've considered a Quark 2xAA ever since the first one came out, yet have never quite gotten one. It's also cheaper but eh...I'm resisted buying any McGizmos, and Surefire doesn't appeal to me...so compared to my main hobby (travel), this one is doing pretty OK cost-wise.
I also have a vague idea that the Jetbeam PA40 neutral is unusually cool for a neutral? I've never had a neutral before. That then again - that said....I've decided to get a Quark mini 2xAA neutral, just so I can have an exact-comparison (once I find out the respective color temps) with my current Quark 2xAA mini R5.
Bleh...can anyone make any sense out of this situation and advise? Or just wing it, that can be useful too.
Last edited: