D
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
Went to a LightWave site ( http://www.abdulla.faris.com/lightwave_dir/Agents_Dir/TECHMANL.RTF ) and in addition to justifying why their light output was better than a 3-cell Krypton, they also did calculations and then made these two statements:
Take our Lightwave 4000 as an example.
On one set of alkaline D-cells our Lightwave 4000 burns over 900 hours. Let's say you would replace the batteries after 500 hours, you want a solid light output.
3 batteries cost $5.50.
Take a conventional flashlight with a Krypton bulb.
It will burn roughly 13 hours on 3 alkaline D-cells. Let's say you would replace the batteries after 8 hours, you want a solid light output.
Over 500 hours you'll need 189 batteries, which will cost you $346.50.
I know LEDs save money, but I never really extrapolated the figures to this degree before.
Take our Lightwave 4000 as an example.
On one set of alkaline D-cells our Lightwave 4000 burns over 900 hours. Let's say you would replace the batteries after 500 hours, you want a solid light output.
3 batteries cost $5.50.
Take a conventional flashlight with a Krypton bulb.
It will burn roughly 13 hours on 3 alkaline D-cells. Let's say you would replace the batteries after 8 hours, you want a solid light output.
Over 500 hours you'll need 189 batteries, which will cost you $346.50.
I know LEDs save money, but I never really extrapolated the figures to this degree before.