LesSaucier
Newly Enlightened
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 5
Thanks for the review! Great Job!
After all this time, I just now noticed the cutaway photo on the ZL website. There's a good chance it was posted in a thread here, but I must have missed it. Pretty cool. Look at all that heat sinking potential!
This question may have already been asked but when I compare the (so called) 1100 lumen setting of the MkII to the 750 lumen setting on my older SC600, I barely see any difference. Furthermore the beam patterns, which are supposed to be the same aren't even close. The MK11 has a significantly smaller hot spot but, paradoxically, seems more floody. I mention that because the specs claim the the beam pattern is identical and I'm starting to think I got a dud.
This question may have already been asked but when I compare the (so called) 1100 lumen setting of the MkII to the 750 lumen setting on my older SC600, I barely see any difference. Furthermore the beam patterns, which are supposed to be the same aren't even close. The MK11 has a significantly smaller hot spot but, paradoxically, seems more floody. I mention that because the specs claim the the beam pattern is identical and I'm starting to think I got a dud. Any one have any thoughts on this?
My SC600 MkII in this review definitely has a more focused hotspot than my original SC600 - you can see this in the comparison beamshots. I suspect part of this is due to a reflector change, and part is due to the switch to XM-L2 emitters from XM-L. Don't know if things have progressed further since this review was done.Furthermore the beam patterns, which are supposed to be the same aren't even close. The MK11 has a significantly smaller hot spot but, paradoxically, seems more floody. I mention that because the specs claim the the beam pattern is identical and I'm starting to think I got a dud. Any one have any thoughts on this?
Hmmm, all my recent Keeppower protected 3100mAh fit fine in my MkII (labels on). But again, there may be some variability (in both battery and light) over time.Anyone else have a problem with the battery compartment being ever so slightly small? I have a Keeppower 18650 and even when I removed the label the fit is rather tight. To remove the battery you have to band the lip on a ledge to dislodge the battery.
Anyone else have a problem with the battery compartment being ever so slightly small? I have a Keeppower 18650 and even when I removed the label the fit is rather tight. To remove the battery you have to band the lip on a ledge to dislodge the battery.
For those who wanted more of a "thrower", Zebralight could slightly lengthen the body back to the original 600 size which would accommodate a longer reflector. If that would noticeably increase throw, I would be willing to pay a premium for it, and I suspect some others might feel the same way.
Brightnorm
Zebralight is often a bit snug for high-output batteries. My Eagletac 3400mAh fit fine, as do all my 3100mAh cells. But ones with separate labels can be a bit of a challenge to get in and out though.Has anyone else experienced this or is this a manufacturing defect of the light? These batteries fit just fine in my other 18650 lights.
I just got my SC600 Mk2 L2 and found that the Panasonic 18650 3400 mAh battery I wanted to install was an EXTREMELY tight fit.
Has anyone else experienced this or is this a manufacturing defect of the light? These batteries fit just fine in my other 18650 lights.
I have Keeppower 2600s and the fit is mighty tight. I also have to bash the light on my wife's head to get the cell out.
One of the Sony V5 (I think) that I bought recently fits just fine.
Someone here mentioned filing the inside of the battery compartment.