ddaadd
Enlightened
Looking forward to more comparisons BVH!
Great work so far, kinda glad I went with -3a myself .....
Concerning the FAA, I came across this communication from '05 from an owner
of a 60" searchlight that i found interesting......(near end of page)....
Searchlight page
I intend to contact the FAA in a similar manner, as I am in a seldom
used approach path to MCI airport, this path seems to put aircraft well within
reach of the -3a beam. I doubt I could cause light to enter a pilots vision
as I am in a valley shooting upwards, but prefer to at least let them know what I am up to.....
Edit: Not sure why the aircraft would be so low at apx 20mi from the airport?
Guessing 3,000 ft altitude or less.......
Great work so far, kinda glad I went with -3a myself .....
Concerning the FAA, I came across this communication from '05 from an owner
of a 60" searchlight that i found interesting......(near end of page)....
Searchlight page
I intend to contact the FAA in a similar manner, as I am in a seldom
used approach path to MCI airport, this path seems to put aircraft well within
reach of the -3a beam. I doubt I could cause light to enter a pilots vision
as I am in a valley shooting upwards, but prefer to at least let them know what I am up to.....
Edit: Not sure why the aircraft would be so low at apx 20mi from the airport?
Guessing 3,000 ft altitude or less.......
Last edited: