hawkhkg11
Enlightened
I wasn't responding to the guy. I'm not religious, so I can't be baised. His writing is obviously pro-Israel, and all I wanted to do was point out that both Chomsky and he are biased (one being pro-Palestine and the other being pro-Israel).
Just because he selects facts from various sources doesn't mean he's some objective judger of what Chomsky said. Just like how if you and I were arguing a point, we'd find different articles from the same "news" site to back up our own biases.
About progpaganda...my dictionary says:
"The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause."
pedalinbob thinks us attacking Iraq is good. He tries to prove it with images of dead people (cleverly tapping into our emotions...how demagoguery!) and how we saved their country. That's propaganda.
Just because he selects facts from various sources doesn't mean he's some objective judger of what Chomsky said. Just like how if you and I were arguing a point, we'd find different articles from the same "news" site to back up our own biases.
About progpaganda...my dictionary says:
"The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause."
pedalinbob thinks us attacking Iraq is good. He tries to prove it with images of dead people (cleverly tapping into our emotions...how demagoguery!) and how we saved their country. That's propaganda.