LOUSYGREATWALLGM
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Messages
- 239
You're very much welcome, Paul.
Last edited:
Vesa, or anyone else who might know, is the U2's finish typeII or is it HA?
:thanks:
You guys caught this part too, right?
"- 35W or 40w Xenon HID ( Basic set - 35w output )"
I'm guess that has something to due with this:
http://www.kuvaboxi.fi/mediaobjects/orig/pub/2009/08/20/8143010478554072594orig.jpg
How cool is that!? The U2S is definitely my next light. :naughty:
Crap... dual stage.... CRAP.. CRAP. I just bought the X1 ... should be here tomorrow. C R A P. Now what???? And that price is much cheaper than the current X1 (or P2 for that matter)..... and this light is type III vs type II. Ok I need to stay calm...stay calm.... I told myself I wouldn't need U2 for diving. I convinced myself because I wanted a new light NOW and the X1 was available. This is what happens when you get impatient. argghhhh. We still don't have a release date though...... think it will be before year end?
It would have been nice to see a 35/50 mix. So that the output different would be very noticeable between modes. If the literature is correct with a 35/40 setup then your runtime should be around 100/80 min respectively. I guess that extra 20 min can come in handy for many....
Curtis,
Next, it hasn't been verified that the user can actually switch between 35 and 40 watts. I don't see an adjustment point on the ballast such as a screw or anything. Also the other U2-D didn't even have the same text written on the ballast so who knows. Also, I don't believe that's considered "dual stage" but I don't know what exactly differentiates it electronically from true dual stage either.
Curtis,
First off, I believe the price is around 1290 Euro's not dollars, even though there's a dollar sign there "$" I had the feeling that was going to freak somebody out..... but it is right off the korean website.
Next, the difference of 5 watts is going to be closer to 10 minutes, not 20.
Next, it hasn't been verified that the user can actually switch between 35 and 40 watts. I don't see an adjustment point on the ballast such as a screw or anything. Also the other U2-D didn't even have the same text written on the ballast so who knows. Also, I don't believe that's considered "dual stage" but I don't know what exactly differentiates it electronically from true dual stage either.
Next, there is a peak throw / lux difference between the X1 and the U2-S with LOP reflector. Llook at the lux figures.
U2-D 24,400
U2-S 34,000
PH40 40,000
PH50 54,000
I'm guessing that the smooth X1 going to be very close to the PH40. In any case, you're X1 is still going to out throw either U2 model.
Lastly, it could be 6 months are more before we see this light over here.
All is not lost :thumbsup:
Does the ballast have a pair of extra, very small wires? It might switch like your Blitz, connecting/disconnecting two wires
Thanks for the update and clarification about the wattage Ken.
Curtis, it looks like you made out just fine with the X1. I'm eager for you to receive it too.
I much look forward to your tests, and comparison beamshots vs. PH40 etc if you can do them.I'll have a Abyss U2 "S" in my possession within a couple of days.... I'm excited to test it for the CPF community