betti154
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 229
I agree there's a lot of light coming from multiple XM-Ls at 3A but I'm not convinced they 'destroy' a 35W HID. I did a night dive last week using both a 4*XM-L and a 75W HID. It was pretty murky waters. The XM-L was on the shoulder providing area light and the HID was in the hand looking for the prawns. So, they were both on at the same time. The XM-L with DX reflector is a wider beam than the HID which is colimated/focussed. It penetrated a lot less than I thought in the conditions.
My take is that they compliment each other in the roles they performed but not outdoing each other.I'll take some beamshots above water to show the different spread. I also have a 35W colimated so I'll throw that into the photos.
Be interesting to see how those Ledil optics work with the XM-L's. Thats a nice combination at a reasonable price.
I should be more specific, in that of the two 35w HIDs I compared it to in Florida cave country the 2.4-3A XML with Cute3 optic made the tighther 35w HIDs appear inferior. e.g. the 35w HID spot was not longer visible when beams were overlapped. I've seen some 35w HIDs that are better than others, so to be fair apples aren't apples. The ones I was comparing against were older models too, not the latest from Ligth Monkey for example.
See video below for an example of XM-L Cute3 optic versus the tighter XP-G Cute3.
At time 2:05, you can see firstly the XPG Cute3 @ 1200ma and then behind that the XML Cute3 @ ~2400ma.
At time 2:22, the diver on the left has a XML Cute3 @ ~2400ma