Lithium466
Enlightened
The rotary interface
Also better efficiency (not on the low side, lost probably because of the rotary "communication system" with the tail), which allows a 40s burst (that you can disable, contrary to the legacy) but consumes some power.
Honestly between legacy and current gen, I don't notice any runtime difference in use (should talk in the past, don't have a legacy since like November), except the legacy are able to go longer on a depleted CR123A. I didn't go check runtime difference in the reviews...don't forget newer emitters are more efficient.
Also the legacy doesn't feel like a dinosaur compared to the current gen, switching between the two is almost transparent. Switched to an Ultimate 60 from 2004-2005, and that one feels like a dinosaur in comparison (compared to the current HDS only, the old Ultimate 42/60/85 are still very modern by today's standards, just less "polished") !
I would say, definitely try with legacy driver. The GD+ led...is still nice, I think. No high CRI, probably not the nicest tint there is (compared to modern standard). Feels like a nice vintage luxurious Mercedes, that could still kick you in the butt when you floor it! All things considered, of course, we're talking 170/200lm.
As for the adaptation of the newer led boards and emitter to the legacy reflector, well...
The legacy reflector isn't anodized, which isn't a problem...except if the new led boards used are thicker than the original. Are they? I think they are. Or is it just the new machined heads that are less "deep"? I can't be sure
You wouldn't have a modified light with a reflector you can't screw in completely, right? Surely it's been considered, but perhaps worth asking.
(Bottom, regular HDS, top, factory High Noon with old orange peel reflector, doesn't screw in completely. Both current gen so perhaps apple to orange withthe legacy lights)
Also better efficiency (not on the low side, lost probably because of the rotary "communication system" with the tail), which allows a 40s burst (that you can disable, contrary to the legacy) but consumes some power.
Honestly between legacy and current gen, I don't notice any runtime difference in use (should talk in the past, don't have a legacy since like November), except the legacy are able to go longer on a depleted CR123A. I didn't go check runtime difference in the reviews...don't forget newer emitters are more efficient.
Also the legacy doesn't feel like a dinosaur compared to the current gen, switching between the two is almost transparent. Switched to an Ultimate 60 from 2004-2005, and that one feels like a dinosaur in comparison (compared to the current HDS only, the old Ultimate 42/60/85 are still very modern by today's standards, just less "polished") !
I would say, definitely try with legacy driver. The GD+ led...is still nice, I think. No high CRI, probably not the nicest tint there is (compared to modern standard). Feels like a nice vintage luxurious Mercedes, that could still kick you in the butt when you floor it! All things considered, of course, we're talking 170/200lm.
As for the adaptation of the newer led boards and emitter to the legacy reflector, well...
The legacy reflector isn't anodized, which isn't a problem...except if the new led boards used are thicker than the original. Are they? I think they are. Or is it just the new machined heads that are less "deep"? I can't be sure
You wouldn't have a modified light with a reflector you can't screw in completely, right? Surely it's been considered, but perhaps worth asking.
(Bottom, regular HDS, top, factory High Noon with old orange peel reflector, doesn't screw in completely. Both current gen so perhaps apple to orange withthe legacy lights)
Last edited: