but if you were going to ADD up the 9 AA cells capacity numbers?
It shoulda been like 6000ma for each 3, vrses the ONE alledged 12000ma of the alkaline Dcell.
so if you were going to add up all the capacites at the single cell voltage to get 18,000 to 24,000 , then you should have included 3 of the D cells TOO, at what 36000.
if your going to draw a FULL amp from the series set of Dcells, then a single LSD 10,000 nimhy would give you the same relative power as a alkaline. and if you were drawing more like 3amps, or more, the ni-mhy will work better. Discluding the fact that the Alkaine would prefer to be rested, and when rested it would work a bit better.
so relativly speaking a Ni-mhy would indeed be very good, a nice fat D cell being best for the application vrses having so many connections of the multiple parellel AA cells, which can cause more problems.
check out the latest thread on LSD D cells, they were sure to come, and HAVE, the answer to the D cell problem, and trying to wedge 50 enloops into something
already any of the ni-mhy Dcells worked great, with 9000ma and up, they didnt have as much issue with self discharge to begin with, compared to high cap AAs.
if you parellel series a bunch of high capacity self discharging AAs together, then let it SIT and discharge , you will end up with a mess, they will stay "balanced" in the parellel sets, assuming they are connected well, but the self discharge will still cause each series set to be offset. sooo less parts and pieces, less self discharge, and less stuff to have problems would be big fat Dcell LSDs that just came out.