Arc4+ Second, first impressions

Candle Power Forums

Help Support Candle Power:

Status
Not open for further replies.

paulr

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
10,832
My Arc4+ Second arrived about a half ago and I've naturally been fooling with it since then. I'll post some immediate comments now and more when I've had it longer. I have to say I've been skeptical of the computerized aspects of the Arc4 concept from the beginning, so this review is colored that way.

First thing I did on opening the package was unscrew the battery compartment and drop in a battery to try out the light, deliberately without reading the instructions. You shouldn't need instructions for this basic operation. I unscrewed the battery compartment (the correct thing) rather than the tailcap (the wrong thing) partly because I knew about this issue, but the tailcap seems to be on tighter, so twisting it actually takes off the battery compartment. I guess that's good.

The beam is whiter than any LED flashlight I've ever had so far. There's maybe the slightest yellowish tinge just around the edge of the hot spot.

I checked in on CPF and added a post to the roll call. I then looked carefully at the light to see why it's a second. There was a big fingerprint on the lens protector but that cleaned off easily. There's a little bit of dust and crud on the reflector, not enough to affect operation, and perfectly acceptable for a second, but I can understand why a finicky buyer might be bothered by it in a first. It's an expensive electro-optical device like a medium priced camera, so buyers are entitled to use the same standards when checking the optics as they would when they buy a camera, and camera optics should not be this dirty. Anyway, this dust can be solved with a puff of filtered air during assembly.

There are barely noticable color gradients in the HA. There's no holes in the HA that I've noticed so far. The white stuff in the laser engraving for the logo and serial number isn't very even, though. I put the clip on and it seems to me that the screw holes are about 0.2mm further apart than they really should be to put the clip on most easily, but it still went on. No biggie. I'm not crazy about how the screw heads stick up, and would have preferred flat-head screws with countersunk holes in the clip so the screws would be flush or almost flush, but this isn't a big deal either. All in all, I really don't know why this light is a second. It must be because of something that came out in electrical or photometric testing, that's not immediately discernible to a user.

I then looked at the one page (printed both sides) instruction sheet that came in the ziplock bag. It was very cheesily done and just gave basic directions about turning the light on and off in constant and momentary mode, plus a little bit of maintenance info, contact info for Arc, and a pointer to CPF. There was nothing about how to use the advanced flashlight settings or any indication that those settings even exist. So, I think this is a big deficiency. The light needs to come with complete and detailed printed instructions that explain everything. Anything less than that is a crock. The skimpy docs that came with this light make me feel like I got a product that's still in beta test.

I then looked on Arc's web site for instructions and didn't find them (that doesn't mean they weren't there, they just weren't obvious). I then spent several minutes digging through the Arc CPF section and found an old thread with the draft manual. I posted there urging that the instructions be included with the light, which should have bumped that thread to the top. I hope Peter will make that thread sticky for easy access, and also link a copy of the instructions from the Arc4/4+ page on Arc's site.

Following the instructions from the advanced instruction thread, I tried scrolling through the different modes. Clicking 10 times flashed the Morse letters S-O-S. OK, that's the SOS mode, I can understand that. Except oops, then the light sent its "error" signal and shut off. I'd have expected SOS mode to flash SOS continuously until a rescue chopper arrived or something.

So, click ten times again, SOS mode, morse SOS, ok. Then click once more for button lock mode. That sends a morse letter "I", which makes no sense to me. Why not "B", for button lock? There's no way to remember what mode "I" indicates. Using "B" is no more arbitrary than "I" for those who don't know Morse code, but a lot less confusing for those who do. Also, button lock is a pretty good idea but it's way too much hassle to activate it. Someone else suggested that triple clicking with the light off should activate the button lock. That would be a big improvement.

Clicking again goes to "force primary", indicated by a morse "T". Again confusing, it should use "F". I set the force primary mode, who wants to buy an expensive ultra-bright LED light and then let someone unfamiliar with the controls use it and have it come up in an unimpressive secondary mode?

Next is the locator flash, denoted by morse "E" instead of "L". The locator flash on my unit is pretty bright, which means I have older firmware. I'm using a Yungtong battery and vaguely remembre some problem with older firmware and Yungtongs, but so far haven't noticed anything bad happening. The locator flash itself seems pretty useless, way too bright at this setting and probably too bright even at level 16. A very dim continuous glow would be better. And speaking of firmware, I still don't know if this light is eligible for $20.00 firmware upgrades. So far, nothing makes me think I need one yet though.

Next menu item controls the useless and confusing ready-for-service mode, which for some reason is on by default, even though it uses battery power even when the light is turned off. I turned it off, good riddance. It's nuts; I should have mentioned at the beginning of this post how it confused me when I first turned on the light. This mode should certainly be off by default and maybe removed entirely, perhaps replacing it with a diagnostic function accessible only through some menu. The very existence of this function makes me fear future versions of the firmware will take longer and longer to boot, just like Windows 95 or Microsoft Word. There's just no reason why anyone should ever have to wait 10 seconds to boot a flashlight. There's just none, ever.

Clicking 10+ times is pretty annoying and will probably cause repetitive stress injuries if done too often. Holding the button in for several seconds to select an item is also pretty painful.

Also very annoying: when you reach some spot in the menu, you then have just a few seconds to either activate that mode or scroll to the next item. Otherwise you get an error signal and you have to start over, clicking ten times etc. If you scroll to some item, then stop while you read the instructions to see what to do next, the menu will time out on you. That's bad design. It should let you take as long as you want, or if there's a timeout at all, it should be a very long one, like 10 minutes.

I didn't try the tactical modes. Maybe later. I also didn't try changing any of the brightness settings. I conceivably might. I don't see much need for 16 levels though. Three levels (1, 7, 15) is plenty. Two is really enough.

I'm not clear whether the triple-click level is 15 or 16, but as ultra-dim modes go, if any are going to be supplied, it would be nice if the light went even dimmer, by at least several stops. Level 16 (or is it 15) on this light seems somewhat brighter than my current coin cell light (1x5mm LED direct (under)driven from a 3 volt CR2032). Well, sooner or later I'll get a Rigel Systems Starlite, which dims down to practically zero.

All in all, this light is quite an improvement over the Arc LS, which seemed more thrown-together, and which had a big problem spelled K-r-o-l-l. I like the Arc4's beam and brightness a lot and the Arc4 itself is well made. The pushbutton ergonomics for normal use are tolerable and the flared tailcap will help it a lot. Knurling on the head might improve the grip a little but isn't really needed and I think the light looks better without it.

Replacing the LS's mechanical power switch with a logic signal greatly reduces the switch flakiness and that by itself makes the microprocessor approach worthwhile. However, the user interface for the advanced modes leaves a lot to be desired. I think this amount of configurability and a one-button interface don't mix. Either the functions should be trimmed to essentials, or more controls should be added, or some way should be provided to configure the light through a computer/PDA using a GUI. The click-double click scheme of switching between primary and secondary brightness is nowhere near as intuitive as the Surefire A2 interface of pressing the button partway for low brightness and all the way for high brightness. The forthcoming SF U2 will apparently have a rotating ring around the barrel to select six brightness levels. That too sounds much better than the Arc4's infinite clicking.

All in all, the Arc4 is an interesting and significant development in the emerging technology of LED flashlights. It's like the early days of digital watches or calculators. Someday everyone will be using these things, but there's quite a bit more development and interface evolution between now and then. Those of us who are technology buffs should feel fortunate to be seeing this exciting new stuff unfolding before our eyes. Those who are normal flashlight users should probably see the Arc4 as an improvement over traditional lights that introduces some foibles of its own, not the be all and end all, but as something that points the way to lights that for now can only be imagined.
 
thanks for the review. while i agree with your observations on the morse letters making more sense as you would have them, it assumes that the average user would actually know morse code to begin with. i sure as heck don't.

i also fully agree with your gripe about the instructions. i can't believe Peter hasnt fixed this much-reported deficiency yet. when i finally get around to spending almost $200 on a flashlight i sure dont want to have to log onto the internet and stare at a computer screen for instructions. i think it should also come with a business card size reference sheet as some members have posted.
 
I don't see much point to a business card sized reference sheet. The basic operations aren't that hard to remember. If there's a desire for a quick reference, it should be engraved directly on the light.
 
Thanks for the review paulr. I agree completely regarding the lights documentation/instructions. Poor documentation seems to be a big problem with all types of products these days, most of them produced in the Orient. I really think that Peter should stop telling us all why we don't need the full instructions with our $180 flashlight, and just put them in the bag already. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif It's very true that the videos will get you "up to speed" faster than written instructions, but this light should also come with full and complete instructions as well. The fact that it doesn't is a big oversight in my opinion.

As far as the Morse code, you're on your own there. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thinking.gif I don't know it, don't want to learn it, and don't think it has anything to do with the 4+ other than the S.O.S. function. Once you've used the light for a little while, all the menus are quite easy to navigate. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif


Peter
 
If Peter wants people to watch videos, that's fine, include a DVD or VHS cassette with the light, along with the printed instructions. Don't make people find the directions on the internet.
 
I received my ARC4+ second today and except for a color mismatch, it's GREAT. Detailed instructions would be nice but in my opinion, not really necessary. Most people will either throw them away or lose them. Considering that most homes have a PC and internet access, putting the instructions on the net is good enough - just make them easily accessable. Engraving the instructions or some form of "cheat sheet" on the light itself would detract from the looks of the light and drive costs up which could be undesirable. Clicking 10+ times to enter the menu is ok in my opinion. Anyone who does it enough to get repetitive stress injuries needs to put the light away and get a life.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Thanks for the review Paul. It's good to hear from someone who was a bit skeptical going into it. I'm a big fan of ARC (I EDC an ARC AAA and LSH-P), but the complexity of this light has kept me away. I've got dozens of flashlights, and to date the most complex lights I have are the SF L1 and A2. I don't want or need 16 different levels or multiple "modes" and button pushes to operate a light. Like you said, three levels would be plenty (who really needs 16 different levels on a light?). I still may try to pick one of the 2nd's up if I can get a good deal on it, just to get a closer look at the light, but from what I've seen so far, I'm not too impressed because of the complexity. I'm quite adept at learning about new technology, but to me a flashlight is simply a tool to provide more light where there isn't enough, and should be simple to operate. Frankly if all future ARC designs are going to be functionally similar to the ARC4, I may have to just be satisfied with the ARC's I have. That's a real shame, because I really like the ARC lights I have. I was looking forward to checking out the ARC5, but if it is just a more powerful version of the ARC4, I'll pass. Call me a luddite, but I like things as simple as possible.

-Keith
 
OK, I'm playing around with the brightness settings.

I can understand there's these two settings you can switch between, but unless you're in "force primary" mode, I don't understand why one setting is "primary" and the other "secondary". In particular when I turn the light on, I don't know whether I've got the primary or secondary level. If I want to set primary to 3 and secondary to 8, the only way I know for sure to do it is set force primary mode, then use the brightness menu to set the primary, then unset force primary mode, then turn the light on to switch to secondary, then turn it off again, then go to the brightness menu and set the secondary.

I think I might like setting primary level 3 (saves batteries), secondary level 1 (brightest), and force primary mode enabled. So the light comes on at level 3, but I can double click to get full brightness and leave it there. The feature of holding the button down to get full brightness momentarily is not very useful IMO. I'd rather have it stay bright til I double click again. So I may try setting it up this way.

On full brightness, this thing utterly destroys the BB400/Q3L/NX05 Minimag that I sold a while ago (presumably comparable to an LSL-P first), and likewise the LSL-P second that I had (which had good brightness but purple tint). I suspect that it beats any LSH-P or LSHF-P that Arc has ever shipped, though I won't extend that to modded units (some people are running those at 1 amp). So if you ignore all the computer stuff, at $99.95 you've still got a better light than a considerably more expensive older model. However, it hasn't really staunched my desire for a 5 watt light.
 
Hey Keith, don't knock it 'till you try it. There's no reason to be scared, it's just a flashlight. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif

The best flashlight Arc has made to date. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif



Peter
 
LitFuse, you're probably right. If the "programming" can be done once and never bothered with again, and it can give me my three settings (probably 1, 8, 16) with a minimum of fuss (and button-pushing) it may be worth considering. I still like the KISS principle, but you're right, I should reserve final judgement until I have had a chance to try one.

-Keith
 
NeonLights,
I think this is where I should wade in.
Do yourself a favor and don't dismiss the ARC4 because it's to complicated. I'm one of those old geezers that likes to keep it simple. I want my cell phone to be a phone not a video game or Internet link. I want my pager to be just a pager, etc.
I am a ARC/Surefire fan, but I was hesitant to get a ARC4 because I thought it would be like a digital watch and be a real pain to use. The ARC4 is not hard to use or to learn to use. I got a ARC4 because I trust Peter Gransee enough to give the ARC4 a try. I have a life time supply of ARC LSH-Ps, but the ARC4 is my new EDC.
 
I ordered one for an old geezer friend of mine and gave it to him today.
He couldn't believe the 10 page instruction manual.
He laughed hysterically when he learned that software upgrades were available.
He swore like a sailor when he couldn't get into the brightness menu.
He positively beamed when he finally mastered it (in one day).
And he stopped to show it to everyone we met.
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
No, I printed it off the board for him.
And I don't care what anyone says, the instructions for entering the brightness menu are flat out wrong.
 
Well, I just got back from a trip to the can where I tried reading a book while enthroned. Level 10 was about the best brightness for this. However, the light is really too directional for things like this, the hotspot is too small at that distance, so there's a bright spot on the page and then the surrounding parts are lit only by spill. That follows from the reflector shape, which is a fundamental design issue for the whole flashlight. I realize it's the way it is in order to optimize throw, and I'm in a small minority in saying that I'd rather sacrifice throw and have wider angle, smooth illumination in an EDC light. 95% of my EDC usage is for close-up illumination so I'd rather have an EDC light optimized for that.

Maybe some future models can have it both ways, with some small leds in the reflector (like some of the PT headlamps have three 5mm leds surrounding a Luxeon, or the SF A2 has three 5mm's and a xenon lamp).
 
The only people I see who want to have level 1 as one of their two settings are people who either:

1. Don't own an Arc4. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hahaha.gif

2. Haven't really thought things through yet. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thinking.gif


Keith, Send me a PM and I'll send you one of my 4+ seconds to "get a closer look at" - no strings attached. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif




Peter
 
I "thought it through" after I burned up a battery in less than a day of playing with it with Level 1 as the Primary. Now level three is my Primary and Level seven, where I spend most my time, is my secondary. This more moderate gradation has resulted in two weeks and counting of battery life using the light as EDC and my "Walking through the dark house light"

Meanwhile, Level one is always available to me with the "Boost" function. I've not yet needed it longer than I've ever cared to hold the button.
 
It's a flaming comspiracy!
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rant.gif
Arc is actually convincing us that we don't need the brightest light ever invented!
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rant.gif


/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinser2.gif
 
Heresy! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rant.gif

Heretic! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rant.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/evilgrin07.gif

You must be punished! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/whoopin.gif


Well, you get the idea! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif


Peter
 
Some interesting points are made in this thread.

However, I don't think that it is really fair to judge this light until one has lived with it for at least three days. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

I found certain aspects of programming it slightly awkward the first day. I had to get used to its performance the next day. By the third day, I felt that it was completely intuitive and actually VERY easy to use.

There is a learning curve here, but the benefits that it has over other lights are MANY.

I love this light!


.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top