If you consider each Eneloop as 1.2V at 2200mAhhow many enelopes does it take to get the same runtime of a 4400 mah 21700?
I would much rather put the $ towards eneloops and to a lesser extent L91's than alkalines - I've had way too many alkalines leak while still in the packages, years before their expiration date to waste money on them. Not to mention all of the items damaged or destroyed by leaking alkalines.That's one way to look at it BUT if you're worried about preparedness the redundancy of multiple lights using eneloops could be a better answer to a lighting problem.
A test I just ran with my LD12 shows me if total light out put is what I want; cheap Harbor Freight AA batteries are a better answer than Energizer L91 batteries. For the cost of 1 L91 I can get 6 HF AA batteries. 1 L91 = 8 1/2hrs, 1 HF = 2 3/4hr; so for the same cost I can have 8 1/2 or 16 1/2 hours of 70L light.
+cool looks like ill go with 21700 plus im sure they can provide more amps
Yeah not quite the full picture as it also depends on the circuitry used and the LED too as you can have buck circuitry that essentially exchanges excess voltage for higher current and also internal resistance of batteries that under high current can either handle it or cause the batteries to heat up and have power loss and voltage drop. 18650s and 21700s can be gotten that handle high currents over 20A and with lower internal resistance lose less power doing so perhaps.+
+
This is key, being able to provide more amps.
The 6 eneloops (in W/hr) will go up, if you push more Amps,, it changes the playing field.
So trying to make a reasonable 500lm, you may need 8 eneloops to hang with a 21700 ~ if eneloops even do it at all.
Just looking at W/hr, is not the full picture.
So my previous answer of a small handful was in super simple terms.
+... My concern is that they will come out with yet another "common" battery size for cars and power tools and 21700s could go the way of 20700s in the future.
It may be the best bang for the buck when it comes to price but energy density is pretty much the same and 18650 cells are for now cheaper per mah than 21700s I think. I believe the 5000mah 21700s are a little more density than the 3500 18650s are but it is rather negligible. Basically it comes down to size vs total capacity with consideration to higher current capability of 21700s and likely lower internal resistance. The larger size of 21700 in some cases is a drawback when you only need a few cells. If you don't need a huge amount of lumens for a long time or the max power you can get for now the 18650 still rules the market but quickly I think the two cell sizes are going to be commonplace.+
Even if there is a new '24800' or whatever, I'm not buying it.
Getting new lights, batteries & chargers to fit, becomes a lesson in economics.
If my 21700s' can't get the job done, I missed the plot.
__________
Tesla proved that the 21700 size is a top bang for the buck, in energy density.
(do you think they didn't look at every possible size, likely not)
Yes they have a new battery, it's huge..maybe for some giant light cannon 2025
They could be the Chinese ones which aren't IMO worth it. There are 2000mah eneloops and eneloop pros that are about 2400 I think but 2200s remind me of the Rayovac Hybrids which preceded eneloops on the market by I think 6 months to a year or so. Most of my ROV cells have gone bad vs about 10% of my Duraloops have gone bad the majority of which are AAAs I think. I say stay away from chinese eneloops entirelyWhere are you guys finding 2200 mah Eneloops?