Bones
Enlightened
Based on recent revisions to their website in the United Kingdom, it appears that Duracell is updating the appearance of their NiMH cells.
It also appears that they're attempting to steer consumers towards a particular type of NiMH cell based on its anticipated usage:

-
Noting that the bracketed insertions are mine, item 18 of the website's rechargeable FAQs provides additional clarification:
What's really intriquing though, is that what they're now calling their 'Standard' cell is actually their low-capacity 1700mAh standard NiMH cell.
It seems they've decided to capitalize on a fact that is well-known to members of this forum, being that low-capacity regular NiMH cells are vastly more reliable and robust than their higher capacity siblings.
Could Duracell actually be moving towards conceding the capacity war in favor of rechargeable cells that won't fail their customers within a very few months?
It almost seems too ethical to be true...
It also appears that they're attempting to steer consumers towards a particular type of NiMH cell based on its anticipated usage:

-
Noting that the bracketed insertions are mine, item 18 of the website's rechargeable FAQs provides additional clarification:
From what little additional information is available, it appears that what was their 2000mAh low self-discharge cell will now be called the 'Active Charge' cell, and their high-capacity 2650mAh regular NiMH cell will now be the called the 'Supreme'.What is the difference between the 3 different types of rechargeable battery?
Endurance (Active Charge) range: Once charged, power stays available for use, there's more life per charge, they're convenient, and pre-charged so ready for use immediately.
Performance (Supreme) range: Best for frequent use consumers who take a lot of photos at once.
Value (Standard) range: Can be recharged more times than higher capacity batteries.
What's really intriquing though, is that what they're now calling their 'Standard' cell is actually their low-capacity 1700mAh standard NiMH cell.
It seems they've decided to capitalize on a fact that is well-known to members of this forum, being that low-capacity regular NiMH cells are vastly more reliable and robust than their higher capacity siblings.
Could Duracell actually be moving towards conceding the capacity war in favor of rechargeable cells that won't fail their customers within a very few months?
It almost seems too ethical to be true...