JET YCOY
Newly Enlightened
GOOD TO KNOW NA MAY MGA PINOY DIN PALA DITO. KEEP IT UP! FLASHAHOLICS
I use a mix of 76 AA Eneloop cells purchased in 2007 and 2008. The 2007s typically rate from 1850 to 1900mAh, with internal resistances of 1.60 to 1.65VDC. The 2008s typically rate 1900 to 1950mAh, with internal resistances of 1.50 to 1.58VDC.
Out of all those, I have exactly one cell that seems a bit off, rating at 1750mAh. IIRC, the IR was about 1.65VDC on this one. This is also the only cell of the bunch with a slightly dented in base, so I'm guessing it got dropped on its butt.
The 16 AAAs I have are also mixed ages, but nearly all around 840 to 850mAh, with higher IRs from 1.85 to 1.95VDC.
Seems to me they're aging most gracefully.
Resistance is measured in ohms, not volts.I use a mix of 76 AA Eneloop cells purchased in 2007 and 2008. The 2007s typically rate from 1850 to 1900mAh, with internal resistances of 1.60 to 1.65VDC. The 2008s typically rate 1900 to 1950mAh, with internal resistances of 1.50 to 1.58VDC.
Out of all those, I have exactly one cell that seems a bit off, rating at 1750mAh. IIRC, the IR was about 1.65VDC on this one. This is also the only cell of the bunch with a slightly dented in base, so I'm guessing it got dropped on its butt.
The 16 AAAs I have are also mixed ages, but nearly all around 840 to 850mAh, with higher IRs from 1.85 to 1.95VDC.
Seems to me they're aging most gracefully.
The readings quoted by WDG would be the initial test voltages reported by the C9000 when you place a battery on charge. This voltage is proportional to the internal resistance of the cell and is a fairly good health indicator.How do you measure internal resistance? Do I need a special device or something?
See above.Resistance is measured in ohms, not volts.
The readings quoted by WDG would be the initial test voltages reported by the C9000 when you place a battery on charge. This voltage is proportional to the internal resistance of the cell and is a fairly good health indicator.
I use a mix of 76 AA Eneloop cells purchased in 2007 and 2008. The 2007s typically rate from 1850 to 1900mAh, with internal resistances of 1.60 to 1.65VDC. The 2008s typically rate 1900 to 1950mAh, with internal resistances of 1.50 to 1.58VDC.
Out of all those, I have exactly one cell that seems a bit off, rating at 1750mAh. IIRC, the IR was about 1.65VDC on this one. This is also the only cell of the bunch with a slightly dented in base, so I'm guessing it got dropped on its butt.
The 16 AAAs I have are also mixed ages, but nearly all around 840 to 850mAh, with higher IRs from 1.85 to 1.95VDC.
Seems to me they're aging most gracefully.
The readings quoted by WDG would be the initial test voltages reported by the C9000 when you place a battery on charge. This voltage is proportional to the internal resistance of the cell and is a fairly good health indicator.
I didn't even know the MH-C9000s gave this kind of information when I first got them. It was from reading through CPF that I discovered it, and how useful it is. Here's a page that gives a good explanation of what the numbers mean: Interpreting Maha MH-C9000 Impedance Check Voltage linked from TakeTheActive's TTA's Picks for Best Answers to Rechargeable Battery Questions
Thanks for the links! seems like I need to do a lot of readings. I just got my c9000 and batteries today.
Wonder if I should do a capacity test on all of them just to see how consistent these eneloops are. I got 80 AA's and 20 AAA's all with the same production code thus were produced in the same batch. Has anybody performed a test like this with this big of a sample size?![]()
If you do a capacity test on all of them, I'd love to see the numbers just to compare them to mine. But since you have 100 eneloops I guess we'll see them numbers in about 3 weeks or so.![]()
3 weeks? try 3 months. I plan to do discharge>break-in>discharge>break-in on each set to bring them to full capacity. 4days/setx25 =100daysnow I can cut that in half if I can get my hands on another c9000 :naughty:
As much as I would like to go with the deep cycle marine batteries with a GOOD float charger for power, those are close to impossible to source locally. All the "battery specialists" that I've called don't even know what a deep cycle marine battery is. Buying it online and Having it shipped to my location would cost too much as freight charges are crazy expensive here.
3 weeks? try 3 months. I plan to do discharge>break-in>discharge>break-in on each set to bring them to full capacity. 4days/setx25 =100daysnow I can cut that in half if I can get my hands on another c9000 :naughty:
...and another resurrection here in 2012. Worthy of it, since the thread documents historical Eneloop performance. I've been using the BI mode on my Maha C9000 to revive my cells and have observed:
2006-vintage Eneloop AAs average 1871 mAh capacity (for 12 cells)
2007-vintage .................................1942 mAh (for 2 cells)
2010-vintage .................................1986 mAh (for 9 cells)
2011-vintage ................................. waiting for BIM to finish, will report soon.
None of these cells stored in refrigerator, and many of them were not sufficiently exercised (I had no Maha to refresh) until now. Many of them were in low-draw applications that would take years to deplete; some were in high-draw flashlights, and many others waiting around in the drawer to be used. So a mix of usages. Without regular R&A or BIM, these cells were not particularly well cared for.
What is R&A and BIM?