It is not true that all colors preserve dark adaptation. Long wavelength reds are the only colors that do not significantly destroyed rod cell's rhodopsin (visual purple). Other colors can be used at low intensities, but any other colors besides long wavelength reds will chew up rod cell's rhodopsin to some extent and if they are at all bright, ruin dark adaptation. Long wavelength reds can be used at much higher intensities than any other colors without ruining dark adaptation.
The eyes are most sensitive to green and so it is commonly used in dark environments because it can be used at the lowest intensity. But if it is high intensity, bye-bye to dark adaptation.
Since most maps use a lot of red lines, red is lousy for map reading and is generally lousy for color contrast. This is another reason low-intensity green (if monochromatic like an LED) and low-intensity yellow (if wide spectrum like a filtered incandescent) is used a lot for night use.
As far as night vision equipment, it depends on the photocathode material used, but if my recollection is working (it's been twenty years since I studied various photocathode materials and their spectral response) most have similar enough sensitivities at red and green this is not going to make much difference. Any light source, even dim ones, regardless of color pretty much light up night vision equipment like all get go. FLIR is a completely different animal of course.
Pilots and sailors almost exclusively use red for cockpits and pilot-houses at night. Low intensity, wide-spectrum yellow has been a favorite for map reading because of the red issues for maps.