Fenix TK10 , TK11 .TK12

Maththecat

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
9
Hey guys, i'm going to buy my first (good) LED flashlight, and i need to know what one is best suited for everyday things and Military use.
I've read about them all and it seems like they're pretty much the same but for some minor things.
The TK12 and 10 seem alot alike the only different is the TK12 has more modes and looks a little different and can use 18650 battery's with the special 18650 tube thingy( thats what fenix said when i emailed them)
the fenix TK11 R2 is a little diffrent then both cuz it can max out at 240 instead of 225 lumans, and can run 18650batterys with out a tube thingy also i think the TK11 has a diffrent reflector then the TK12 and 10 right?
Anyway do you this light will hold up in combat? like is it durable?
Also is their any mounts for this so i can put it on my M4 rifle? Thanks guys:)

 
I would recomend a TK 11. 18650 support is an important feature imho.

The main difference is the reflector - TK 11 uses a SMO reflector for maximum beam, TK 10 and TK 12 have an OP reflector with slightly more spill, so it mainly depends on if you are looking for maximum range?

The 15 lumen difference (for the TK11 R2) is not really noticable, but what the hack... ;)

If you are going for the "more spill" option, TK12 is probably the better choice as it offers three presets of modes. So the only difference between TK10 and TK12 is the upgraded circuit with the additional presets.

Hope I could help :)
 
i was kinda thinking i would go with that, what one should i get TK11 R2 or the TK11 Q5? and also the TK12 can use 18650 battery's well that's what fenix said when i emailed them, here this what they said word to word.

"TK12's circuit can be supported by 18650, but the existing body is not fit for it, so we will also provide the special 18650 tube."

but whats so good about 18650 battery's beside being rechargeable?
 
TK11 will throw significantly further than the 10/12, but has a smaller hot spot.

If at all possible try and get your hands on both before you make your decision and compare both, inside and outside, then decide from there.

Being Fenix (and not Surefire) is it possible you could afford both? then you have a backup should one fail (all lights can fail, i'm not saying Fenix are unreliable) and can choose the beam profile that suits you best to EDC. It also means should the tailswitch fail (possibly the weakest link on any light of this type) you can swap the tail cap over while you wait for warranty repairs.

I have both the TK10 and TK11 and I don't regret "wasting" the money on the TK10 first, and its still my EDC, though for outside the increased throw of the 11 is my favorite, shoud I have to choose 1. (I think the TK10 has the edge inside though)
 
I just bought my first Fenix TK11 R2 last week and love it. I like it for several reasons 1) very bright even on the low mode (which is not very low). 2) simple UI with clicky and twist of the head for high/low. 3) Takes one 18650 rechargable or 2 cr123. 4) long run time on low mode. If I could make one improvement it would be a lower low mode but that would only make it more complex. I guess it's close to perfect the way it is.:D
 
I just got my new TK11 in the mail today, and just got back from walking my dog with it. It's a very nice light. Very bright on high, also bright on low (it would be nice if it had an actual low, med and high). It throws nice and far too. I'm using 18650s in it. The advantage to 18650s is longer runtime.
Fenix lists:
18650 = 2.7 hours on high or 12 hours on low
2 CR123A = 1.5 hours on high or 10 hours on low.

It seems like a very sturdy light.
 
I just got my new TK11 in the mail today, and just got back from walking my dog with it. It's a very nice light. Very bright on high, also bright on low (it would be nice if it had an actual low, med and high). It throws nice and far too. I'm using 18650s in it. The advantage to 18650s is longer runtime.
Fenix lists:
18650 = 2.7 hours on high or 12 hours on low
2 CR123A = 1.5 hours on high or 10 hours on low.

It seems like a very sturdy light.

Fenix TK11 Q5 with 18650 has virtually no regulation. Meaning constant degrading light output.

Fenix TK11 R2 with 18650 has about an hour and half of 100% regulation due to the R2s VF. I think it's the VF frequency. Don't remember.

So if you go TK11 and want 18650 you have to use the R2, period. It only makes sense. After that hour and a half you still have an hour or degrading output.

If you want to use cr123 it just really doesn't matter. Same regulation.

It's near impossible for a flashlights circuitry to regulate multi-battery types at 100% output for X amount of time. The way the R2 is designed is why this happens, the hour and a half of 100% output, not the circuitry.

That's something people don't ever mention.

TK11 + 18650 means GET THE R2!!

I prefer the TK10 because I only use cr123 and I prefer the beam for tactical use. The TK11 is a nice thrower, but for general purposes it's not worth it.

I will mention this. BOTH TK11 and TK10 have an ENORMOUS amount of spill. IMO they both have throwy hotspots, with the TK11 being tighter and brighter, but they both have an enormous amount of spill. It's crazy how far the TK11 throws and puts so much light to the sides. Another thing people rarely note.

The TK12 I cannot speak of and will never. I won't but another Fenix but if I did it would't be that one. It's too complicated.

The UI gave me a headache.
 

Anyway do you this light will hold up in combat? like is it durable?
Also is their any mounts for this so i can put it on my M4 rifle? Thanks guys:)


You might want to try searching for "torture tests" of earlier Fenix T models; they seem to be extremely tough.
I think TA 20/21 might be more suitable to use with rifles as Fenix advertised their new "dual recoil absorbing spring", but they are much longer :sick2:
 
You can´t go wrong with the TK10 and TK11 both are great lights and the main difference is that the 11 is more a thrower.
The TK12 is out of the game because is user interfase is complicated and you don´t need that in the field.

My advice will be a TK10 or TK11.
 
OK well after looking at some more lights I've come down to these three lights.
Olight M20 Warrior , fenix TK11 R2 and Jetbeam jet-III military.they all seem very good, i can only afford one light atm, so what one would you recommend for the field? and why? Thanks
 
Fenix TK11 Q5 with 18650 has virtually no regulation. Meaning constant degrading light output.

Fenix TK11 R2 with 18650 has about an hour and half of 100% regulation due to the R2s VF. I think it's the VF frequency. Don't remember.

So if you go TK11 and want 18650 you have to use the R2, period. It only makes sense. After that hour and a half you still have an hour or degrading output.

If you want to use cr123 it just really doesn't matter. Same regulation.

It's near impossible for a flashlights circuitry to regulate multi-battery types at 100% output for X amount of time. The way the R2 is designed is why this happens, the hour and a half of 100% output, not the circuitry.

That's something people don't ever mention.

TK11 + 18650 means GET THE R2!!

I prefer the TK10 because I only use cr123 and I prefer the beam for tactical use. The TK11 is a nice thrower, but for general purposes it's not worth it.

I will mention this. BOTH TK11 and TK10 have an ENORMOUS amount of spill. IMO they both have throwy hotspots, with the TK11 being tighter and brighter, but they both have an enormous amount of spill. It's crazy how far the TK11 throws and puts so much light to the sides. Another thing people rarely note.

The TK12 I cannot speak of and will never. I won't but another Fenix but if I did it would't be that one. It's too complicated.

The UI gave me a headache.

Basically, what he said.

I have had my TK11 (Cree Q5) for about a year now, and like yourself a year ago when I asked on here what high performance light I should buy I was totally new to all of this. Almost a year later and I am mostly glad that I bought the TK11 but also still have that one major niggle with it - NO regulation whatsoever therefore constantly degrading light output.

This is a REAL shame as far as the "TK" series is concerned, because I can and will personally vouch for the build quality and design of the TK11. It has a very throwy beam but as Search said it's almost got too much spill for my liking. My Dereelight DBS has (obviously) more throw but has less spill and I don't miss it. If I could change anything on the TK11 I would give it a regulation circuit and a different reflector. I say different reflector because the beam on mine is very uneven and full of artefacts. It doesn't bother me much but you can see where some of the extra money goes on more expensive throwers because (again referring to the DBS) my Dereelight has a near perfect beam with no artefacts whatsoever.

As far as durability, I recently put my TK11 through it's paces just to see if it could stand up to a beating (I bought this light to USE, not to baby like some of my collectable lights!). I tool a selection of my lights to one of Irelands nicest beaches one night a few weeks ago and decided that I would "test" the Fenix. I turned it to turbo mode and threw it several times as FAR and as HARD as I could. The sand it was landing on was wet and hard, not dry and soft. It survived that test so I started throwing it as HIGH up in the air as I could and letting it hit the ground. I did that well over 10 times and the light never flinched. Not satisfied that I had tested it well enough, I threw it into the sea a few times, retreiving it and shaking the water off it each time. The final test was to bury it in the wet sand and leave it there for a few minutes, dig it up again and toss it in the sea once more to wash it off. After all that abuse my light had barely a scratch on it. Obviously the HA coating can stand up to impact with abrasive surfaces like sand very well, and the orings and switch seal are clearly capable of serving their purpose too.

Overall I am very glad that I bought a TK11 as my first light. The lack of regulation never seems like a problem until you actually own a light that has full regulation and see how important and handy a feature it is for a flashlight to have. In that respect, after having carried some of my other regulated flashlights for a while I do miss it when using the Fenix - if I am out for a long period of time I will notice the beam deteriorating gradually and immediately wish that I had lifted the DBS or even my RA85-Tr.

I'd consider buying another TK11 - an R2, just for those 90 minutes or so of regulation on an 18650 cell (which is, incidentally what I run in my current TK11 Q5).

Sorry if I rambled a bit there but good luck in finding a suitable flashlight as your first high performance one.
 
Yea i think that's what I'll do.The only thing i don't like about the TK11 is it doesn't have a low mode,which could be very useful.
 
Fenix TK11 Q5 with 18650 has virtually no regulation. Meaning constant degrading light output.

Fenix TK11 R2 with 18650 has about an hour and half of 100% regulation due to the R2s VF. I think it's the VF frequency. Don't remember.

So if you go TK11 and want 18650 you have to use the R2, period. It only makes sense. After that hour and a half you still have an hour or degrading output.

If you want to use cr123 it just really doesn't matter. Same regulation.

It's near impossible for a flashlights circuitry to regulate multi-battery types at 100% output for X amount of time. The way the R2 is designed is why this happens, the hour and a half of 100% output, not the circuitry.

That's something people don't ever mention.

TK11 + 18650 means GET THE R2!!

I prefer the TK10 because I only use cr123 and I prefer the beam for tactical use. The TK11 is a nice thrower, but for general purposes it's not worth it.

I will mention this. BOTH TK11 and TK10 have an ENORMOUS amount of spill. IMO they both have throwy hotspots, with the TK11 being tighter and brighter, but they both have an enormous amount of spill. It's crazy how far the TK11 throws and puts so much light to the sides. Another thing people rarely note.

The TK12 I cannot speak of and will never. I won't but another Fenix but if I did it would't be that one. It's too complicated.

The UI gave me a headache.

Why would you never buy another Fenix?
 
Not trying to confuse you but before you make your decision you should probably read the Olight M20 Warrior Premium R2 review that Selfbuilt did.

Also the Olight M20 has been field tested quite satisfactory for a weapon's mount by a number of LEO CPF members.

You'll also get that low mode (7 lumens) that you desire.
If this matters to you the Olight M20 R2 is mainly available with an R2 WH bin so the tint will probably be warmer than the Fenix TK 10 or TK 11.
 
Get the TK11R2. Long runtime, full regulation, can take 18650, throws far and looks great.

I wrote a small review here, take a look.

Newer doesn't mean better, I see the TK12 as a downgrade from the older model, too complex UI loaded with unecessary modes and bad design.

Fenix TK11 R2 with 18650 has about an hour and half of 100% regulation due to the R2s VF. I think it's the VF frequency. Don't remember.

I can get more than 2:30 runtime with turbo mode and no brightness lose, and about 17 hours on general.
 
Last edited:
One more: The EagleTac T20C2 also has a 5 lumen low for around 150 hours, and an advertised 300 lumen high.
 
TK12 has the same UI as the TK10 and TK11. Two modes, head tight or loose. That's it. If that is too "complicated", I question how you managed to turn on the computer you are currently reading this post on... :thinking:
 

Latest posts

Top