Knowing

Candle Power Forums

Help Support Candle Power:

That's not really the case Illum. The core Muslim belief is convert or die. Now, the non-converted may be tolerated instead of killed, especially in free societies, but I'm referring to Islamic doctrine. The Quran actually refers to fellow Muslims, who will not join to fight to eradicate non-believers, as hypocrites.

:huh2: well, that is certainly true, I guess I read the wording wrong:ohgeez:

With regards to the M4, I'm not sure since all that could be seen was its silhouette. Even with blu-ray resolution I couldn't tell for certain in paused frames. I'd go look for it again but frankly I'd rather avoid any parts of that movie now that I've seen it once.

My question is how can he possibly see anything reading with an M4 that far up close :crackup:

Effects were an "A" though. :)
Its kinda odd that most of the movies now are mostly the effects and animation that kicks *** but the plot structure seems to sway between Bs and Ds:ohgeez:

Rather than seeing knowing, I think I'll opt for Public Enemies:shrug:
 
Why is it I always seem to come up with better ideas when I see a trailer, than what the movie actually turns out to be.

When I first saw the trailer for "Knowing," I pictured Cage's character finding a more detailed list of predictions. As a few of them come true, and have come true, Cage realizes that the predictions are spot-on. Towards the end of the film, he's able to stop one of the disasters from coming true. That one act, prevents the others from coming true.

At the end, I leave the audience with a sense of hope. That even one man can indeed make a difference, if he puts forth the effort. Audience is left wondering if the predictions were written down for that very purpose. So that if one person found them, he'd try to stop them from coming true; and thus making the world a better place.

Oh yeah, no freaking alien bull$#^% in my version.

Come on guys, tell me that wouldn't have made for a better film.
 
Oh yeah, no freaking alien bull$#^% in my version.


:lolsign:



Yeah, i didn't see the movie, but . . . .


i'm puzzled why the Aliens drive automobiles,

when they are endowed with such amazing super-powers.


:huh2::wtf:



Are they savin' their super-powers for Special Occasions ? ? ?


Like the end of the movie, fer' instance ?

:whistle:

_
 
So when the brain cells, along with you of course, die, where would any sensations or mental presence possibly come from?? But then you get to the soul. It's the thing controlling your brain, experiencing those senses from the brain cells. It's YOU... Weird stuff to think about.


What is it? ..... something like 94% of all cultures believe there's a life after death and 80+ something percent of those believe that our person-hood will be preserved when we leave the body. The best documented NDE's also attest to this notion. It's exactly as you say, the soul exists apart from the body. If I wasn't already at peace with my maker I'd probably spend every waking moment exploring which idea of life after death had the highest probability based off of the evidence available to me.


I found it kind of funny how they made the aliens' propulsion system at the end make them appear like angels, how those bands of energy spring from their back in that wing-looking pattern. The "Garden of Eden" at the end was also amusing

Yes, I caught that also...lol. I guess it fit in with all the goofy implications. :)


Edit: The light is obviously a SureFire M4.
It sure is!


Thanks Monkey boy for being so sharp-eyed. I didn't even remember that scene. The one I was thinking of was when he ran into the woods shouting at the aliens...lol.

Btw, how did you capture that frame so nicely!?
 
Last edited:
well, that is certainly true, I guess I read the wording wrong:ohgeez:

Sorry if I misunderstood you Illum. :) No sweat either way. :twothumbs



My question is how can he possibly see anything reading with an M4 that far up close :crackup:


LOL!!! Yes, exactly! We all know we'd be seeing the infamous dark donut hole in our vision for the next ten minutes...
 
Thanks Monkey boy for being so sharp-eyed. I didn't even remember that scene. The one I was thinking of was when he ran into the woods shouting at the aliens...lol.

Btw, how did you capture that frame so nicely!?

It's a crop of a promotional shot I found on the web somewhere. I actually saw the film on the big screen originally so it was a bit more apparent than DVD I guess.
 
I didn't read any previews so I had no idea what was coming when I saw it. The start was interesting, but further into the film it gets average, and totally blows in the end.
 
while i thought the "angels" looked really cool, for me, the ending was abit too much wishful thinking. Its your typical "chosen ones" story. Its effectively the story of Noah all over.

Crenshaw
 
while i thought the "angels" looked really cool, for me, the ending was abit too much wishful thinking. Its your typical "chosen ones" story. Its effectively the story of Noah all over.

Crenshaw


I thought they looked pretty cool too.

The end didn't seem wishful to me at all, only tragic. All of life on earth apparently died for no other reason than just "bad luck" in a sort of cosmic, wrong place, wrong time scenario. Yes, the two survivors did seem to be chosen, but why? The difference in the Noah account according to the bible, was that Noah was chosen because he pleased God and walked with Him. In other words, there was a reason he and his family were spared. Most of life on earth was destroyed out of judgment because "the whole earth was corrupt" and "the wickedness of man was great" and "the thoughts of man's heart was only evil continually." In the biblical case, a perfectly just creator chose to save for a reason and destroy for a reason, all the while preserving and renewing the earth. In the case of the movie, a random event destroys everything and the two lottery winners are whisked away to an entirely new world, without their families, while the earth is left in hellish fire.

Some interesting but profound differences.
 
i watched it for the disaster scenes which didnt disappoint. i was very hooked when watching to figure what's going on. pretty much disappointed at the ending and having nick cage trying to act emotion is painful to watch(although im a fan of him in certain roles).

i find most appalling is what they list as major disasters. i feel like that's very subjective.

i think i'd still rent it for the disaster scenes. i also like the suspense(scary) parts which i didn't expect.
 
I saw it at the dollar theatre (actually, buck-fiddy)

someone I knew took me to see it, and given their taste in movies, I figured I was in for some action-packed, plotless, mindless, junk reel. It out-did my expectations, didn't think that hollywood still liked to use metaphors since they are too confusing for the average person... Either way, I thought it was pretty good comparatively speaking (but only comparing to current movies, not oldies)
 
I thought they looked pretty cool too.

The end didn't seem wishful to me at all, only tragic. All of life on earth apparently died for no other reason than just "bad luck" in a sort of cosmic, wrong place, wrong time scenario. Yes, the two survivors did seem to be chosen, but why? The difference in the Noah account according to the bible, was that Noah was chosen because he pleased God and walked with Him. In other words, there was a reason he and his family were spared. Most of life on earth was destroyed out of judgment because "the whole earth was corrupt" and "the wickedness of man was great" and "the thoughts of man's heart was only evil continually." In the biblical case, a perfectly just creator chose to save for a reason and destroy for a reason, all the while preserving and renewing the earth. In the case of the movie, a random event destroys everything and the two lottery winners are whisked away to an entirely new world, without their families, while the earth is left in hellish fire.

Some interesting but profound differences.
thats a good point, i didnt notice that noah and family was saved for a reason. THe reason in the movie seemed to be based very flimsy-ly on faith,that they believed that it WAS going to happen...sort of. :shrug:

i think one thing the movie was suggesting, was that cosmic entities/powers beyond out comprehension, were responsible for all the miracles in the bible. The last scene looks like the ascension, looks like elijah's trip to heaven, among other things.

Crenshaw
 
There were more than two children saved. There were a number of those alien ships that left earth and dropped the children off at the new host planet.
 
I thought they looked pretty cool too.

The end didn't seem wishful to me at all, only tragic. All of life on earth apparently died for no other reason than just "bad luck" in a sort of cosmic, wrong place, wrong time scenario. Yes, the two survivors did seem to be chosen, but why? The difference in the Noah account according to the bible, was that Noah was chosen because he pleased God and walked with Him. In other words, there was a reason he and his family were spared. Most of life on earth was destroyed out of judgment because "the whole earth was corrupt" and "the wickedness of man was great" and "the thoughts of man's heart was only evil continually." In the biblical case, a perfectly just creator chose to save for a reason and destroy for a reason, all the while preserving and renewing the earth. In the case of the movie, a random event destroys everything and the two lottery winners are whisked away to an entirely new world, without their families, while the earth is left in hellish fire.

Some interesting but profound differences.

Technically speaking Noah and his family were saved because of their clean bloodline. Everybody else drowned because of genetic contamination, the whole Nephilim thing. This was done to facilitate the birth of the second Adam and thereby ensure the salvation of humanity, most likely even those who were drowned. God is in the business of saving souls and it seems people, even Christians, too often forget that. You don't get condemned to hell or the second death for being bad, death is merely the wages of sin. It is more akin to how if you eat a lot of poison you'll die. God is like poison control working to prevent that from happening and has a plan in place so nobody has to die if they don't want to. Satan is in the business of trying to stop God from saving humanity which is why he tricked Adam and Eve into eating poison in the first place and then attempted to sabotage the breeding program. Taken on the whole Bible is mostly really about eugenics, culminating with the resurrection and the gift of non-fallen bodies.
 
There were more than two children saved. There were a number of those alien ships that left earth and dropped the children off at the new host planet.


I think it was implied but left open to uncertainty. Just one more oddity about the movie that makes no logical sense. It assumes additional instances of prophetic events would have occurred in several corners of the world, which isn't remotely touched on in during the movie. Furthermore, it obviously wouldn't take an entire star ship to carry each pair. Certainly they could have been consolidated onto one ship and dropped off together. They could have hit this idea home had multiple pick-ups been made on earth and then star-ships dropped each pair off at "worlds" scattered around the universe.
 
I think it was implied but left open to uncertainty. Just one more oddity about the movie that makes no logical sense. It assumes additional instances of prophetic events would have occurred in several corners of the world, which isn't remotely touched on in during the movie. Furthermore, it obviously wouldn't take an entire star ship to carry each pair. Certainly they could have been consolidated onto one ship and dropped off together. They could have hit this idea home had multiple pick-ups been made on earth and then star-ships dropped each pair off at "worlds" scattered around the universe.

When viewing modern day sci-fi movies, leave logics and common sense at home...physics too if thats what you major in:crackup:
 
When viewing modern day sci-fi movies, leave logics and common sense at home...physics too if thats what you major in:crackup:

actually while EVERY space movie leaves physics out, and so do most sci-fi movies (there is NO sound in space! but what fun would flying ships shooting lasers be without sound? haha) alot to most of them still employ logic.

however, i would give some credit to certain movies for bringing little known scientific theories, however misrepresented, to the larger audience.

Crenshaw
 
GreyShark
Technically speaking Noah and his family were saved because of their clean bloodline. Everybody else drowned because of genetic contamination, the whole Nephilim thing. This was done to facilitate the birth of the second Adam and thereby ensure the salvation of humanity, most likely even those who were drowned.
With respect to your right of opinion, these statements are simply not accurate from a hermeneutical standpoint. You’re incorrectly assuming that the word “generations” is made in reference to a bloodline, which has nothing to do with Noah, his family or relationship with God. The word “generations” was used in translation to describe the Hebrew word “dor” which means, an age or a revolution of time. “dor” does not mean “bloodline.”

In your interpretation you believe that Gen 6:9 states, “Noah was a just man, perfect in his bloodline” When what it’s really saying according to the Hebrew text is, “Noah was a just man, perfect in his age” or “period of his life.” God condemned the world because it was living a wicked and ungodly existence, not because it was of the "wrong" bloodline. The word generation/s is also used in Isaiah 53:8, and translated from dor. This is better rendered, in the English Standard Version: “and as for His generation or, contemporaries, who considered that He was cut off out of the land of the living, stricken for the transgression of my people?" :thumbsup:


Here is Genesis 6 for those who would like to read it.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=1&chapter=6&version=50
Isaiah 53
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2053;&version=50;

Now, there are other theological debates outside of the clear meaning of “age” such as, was Noah saved by grace alone or was this done because he was described as being a righteous man? Most agree that grace, as we know it is undeserved favor. If it’s believed that Noah found grace because of his “righteousness” then grace is no longer grace. Obviously Noah wasn’t sinless, so Noah’s appeal to God’s grace could be described as Noah making the best use of God’s grace, through his uprightness, thus escaping wrath.


GreyShark
God is in the business of saving souls and it seems people, even Christians, too often forget that. You don't get condemned to hell or the second death for being bad, death is merely the wages of sin. It is more akin to how if you eat a lot of poison you'll die. God is like poison control working to prevent that from happening and has a plan in place so nobody has to die if they don't want to.
I think I see what you’re trying to say, but because of the way it's worded it actually takes on a different meaning. God’s not “in the business of saving souls.” He’s in the business of leading us to the revelation of Himself through nature, conscience and the word, then allows us the choice to accept or reject Him through the mechanism of freewill. Transgression of the law is why we’re condemned and condemnation occurs to those who reject His gift of salvation through Christ. The wages of sin is death but that’s to say that condemnation is not vindictive. God is simply giving people who reject Him what they want in the first place, which is, separation from himself. Without hell, there would be no choice or exercising of freewill. Those who chose to share in relationship with God would end up inheriting a counterfeit heaven while those who chose not a relationship with God would be incarcerated in heaven against their will.

GreyShark
Satan is in the business of trying to stop God from saving humanity which is why he tricked Adam and Eve into eating poison in the first place and then attempted to sabotage the breeding program. Taken on the whole Bible is mostly really about eugenics, culminating with the resurrection and the gift of non-fallen bodies.
Satan is in the business of being in opposition to God’s kingdom. That isn’t to say that he’s God’s opposite, since Satan is a mere created being, who has been “limited by God” according to Job. Since Satan knows he can’t prevent God from doing anything, he instead attempts to interfere with us having a relationship with God through deception among other tactics.
Here is a decent resource for the nature of angles, Satan, and demons:
http://bible.org/seriespage/survey-bible-doctrine-angels-satan-demons

The Bible is not “mostly really about eugenics, culminating with the resurrection and the gift of non-fallen bodies.” Eugenics has to do with the discouraging of reproduction and/or the elimination of persons who are undesirable according to a certain power group, with the goal of achieving desirable human hereditary traits. It’s the “might makes right” mentality in which a few decide the fates of the weak, apart from any choice of the weak. Given the major differences, I don’t see how eugenics could be compared to the message of the Bible. The ultimate culmination for those who know God isn’t just improved bodies but perfect union and harmony with Him, as it was with Adam before the fall.

This isn’t a religious thread but since I started it, I felt compelled to this one response. Beyond this I’ll have to take it to the underground with you. :)
 
Last edited:
This isn’t a religious thread but since I started it, I felt compelled to this one response. Beyond this I’ll have to take it to the underground with you. :)

Good point! I tried to word things in as secular and simple a way as I knew how in as far as it might relate to certain themes of the movie. I agree with much of what you said though I do have a few different views here and there. I'd love to discuss it further with you but I'm not registered on the underground... :(
 
This isn’t a religious thread but since I started it, I felt compelled to this one response. Beyond this I’ll have to take it to the underground with you. :)
Wow patriot, that reponse is beyond my curiosity to research and verify/counter.....:ooo:

Its a good point too, that the english bible isnt necessarily 100%, if you take into account possible translation vague-ness.

its nice to know that it IS possible sometimes to have a mild religious debate without it degenerating to soemthing else.

but we probably should move this to underground, just in case...:tinfoil:

Crenshaw
 
Back
Top