La Crosse BC-900 capacity test charge on Rayovac NIMH test results

LightWalker

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
1,631
Location
USA
I picked up some Rayovac NIMHs at Walmart lastnight and did a capacity test charge on my BC-900. These are the green packaged ones that have no indication of capacity at all. I got four AA for $5.97. My test result readings were:
mah: 1268-1373-1372-1387
voltage: 140-141-141-146
So I guess the capacity is 1400, maybe not such a good deal.
 
So I guess the capacity is 1400, maybe not such a good deal.
Similar numbers to what I got with mine.

Since the did not have any capacity on the label, I assumed they were 2000 mAh cells when I bought them earlier this year. When I got low numbers on my C9000 I contacted Rayovac.

They told me that the Green/Black/Chrome labelled AA NiMh cells were 1400 mAh cells.
 
set some aside for a month and see how fast they self discharge... could be they hold a charge a lot better than the other batteries. I use generic 1600s on stuff around here like a small keyboard vacuum and a fabric shaver and don't have to charge them but once every few months.
 
I had these particular cells in Wii remotes for awhile (before I discovered LSD cells) and they lasted close to a month in them.

Now they just sit in my battery storage container. I think I'll try a self discharge test on them and see how they do.
 
Similar numbers to what I got with mine.

Since the did not have any capacity on the label, I assumed they were 2000 mAh cells when I bought them earlier this year. When I got low numbers on my C9000 I contacted Rayovac.

They told me that the Green/Black/Chrome labelled AA NiMh cells were 1400 mAh cells.

I got these for a radio so I think they will do alright for that or a remote but I would not want to use them for a flaslight/torch or camera or anything high draining like that. The package says they last 3X longer than alkaline, maybe they mean their Rayovac alkaline. :ohgeez:
 
I got these for a radio so I think they will do alright for that or a remote but I would not want to use them for a flaslight/torch or camera or anything high draining like that. The package says they last 3X longer than alkaline, maybe they mean their Rayovac alkaline. :ohgeez:

3X longer refers to the number of shots in the ANSI standard digital camera test. I believe Rayovac alkaline AA cells currently lead the market in performance on that particular test (vs Duracell and Energizer standard alkaline), so the ":ohgeez:" is unwarranted.
 
Top