That is interesting.
Just out of curiosity, I measured the voltage from the BC-900 and BC-700 AC adapters I have.
BC-900 3.037 volts
BC-700 3.153 volts
AC supply to adapters 119.7 volts AC
Both chargers, the BC-900 and BC-700, have been used dozens of times without problems. My Standard charging method is 700ma with the BC-700 and 1000 or 1500ma with the BC-900 charging two cell at a time. Batteries are almost exclusively Eneloop AA cells.
My AC adapters don't have the symbol on the AC adapter that signifiys a problem unit. Of course, they arn't BC-9009 adapters.
question is which adapter is plugged to which charger??
3.1V?? I am hoping it is plugged on the bc-700 instead of the bc-900?? That's quite high.
another factor to consider since technically ac adapters is a power transformer. Wouldn't be surprise if any interference can be causing the chip to crash.
As long as the chip does not crash the charger is ok. For those that had chargers that melted the chip probably crashed the moment the charger started charging the cells without the user even knowing about it.
Definitely between the BC-700 and BC-900 are 2 different programs programmed on the physical chip I am also guessing the bc-700 has a higher resistance than the bc-900 or its like this
BC-700 slight higher resistance = handling voltage maybe up to 3.1V.
BC-900 or 9009 has a much lower resistance which definitely requires no more than 3.00V anything higher you putting it in risk as when the chip crashes your bc-900 has now become a 4AA battery holder directly connected to you AC adapter with no regulation whatsoever lol.
Something has changed since Aug 09. Would start with the AC adapter which I am glad la crosse is stepping up to plate